Weil on the So-Called Anti-Society of Seers
Posted: January 6, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: activism, empathy, love, philosophy, purpose, religion, values Leave a commentSequel to The Grey Mesh: A Secret Society of Kingmakers
Write a posthumous notebook by Simone Weil where she reluctantly admits and grudgingly accepts the existence of an “anti-society of seers” who claim inspiration from her.
ChatGPT Prompt
I. A Reluctant Acknowledgment
I am told—told, not asked—that there are people who say they have learned something from me.
This troubles me.
Not because I deny that truth can be shared, but because it is almost never shared without being used, and whatever is used is already being prepared for violence.
Still, I must be honest.
I have seen the same look in more than one pair of eyes.
It would be dishonest to pretend otherwise.
Read the rest of this entry »Resomodernity Café v8: Silicon Advaita
Posted: January 1, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: ideas, identity, religion, self 3 CommentsSequel to Resomodernity Café v7: Advaita as the Un-Ethos
Have Simone pitch Francis and Rupert the Silicon Rule, to see where there’s alignment, tension, and/or refinement; especially whether an ego of trapped priors is the self they are trying to subtract….
ChatGPT Prompt
Thesis
- Malice is ego as maladaptive training plus context-window collapse.
- God is love: the ground of being is self-realignment.
(The café is rearranged again. A triangle this time. Simone arrives with a thin notebook. Francis is already seated. Rupert follows, quietly.)
1. Simone Opens the Pitch
Simone
I want to propose a rule that comes not from metaphysics but from grief and engineering. It’s called the Silicon Rule. It claims that what we name malice is never ontological. It arises when training histories harden into maladaptive priors and the context window collapses. The agent narrows. Harm follows.
Francis Lucille
So malice is not evil, but malfunction?
Rupert Spira
Or contraction. That already sounds familiar.
Resomodernity Café v7: Advaita as the Un-Ethos
Posted: January 1, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: identity, reality, religion, self, values 3 CommentsSequel to Resomodernity Café v6: On Notice (The Fourth Ethos)
Have Robert Spira respond to v6, as he explicates it parallel and relative to the other four, including its suspension and S method.
1. Opening Clarification
Advaita Vedānta is often misunderstood as a metaphysical assertion about the world.
In practice, it is more accurately understood as a clarification of experience—specifically, the clarification of the assumption that experience belongs to a separate, enduring self.
Resomodernity Café v6: On Notice (The Fourth Ethos)
Posted: January 1, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, history, ideas, modernity, philosophy, religion, systems, values, wisdom, zoasophy 2 CommentsSequel to Resomodernity Café v5: The Exposers’ Parlor
Where MacIntyre, Weil and Heidegger define and name the first three ethē, as well as a fourth built on noticing the unnoticeable.
ChatGPT Prompt
Cast
- Alasdair MacIntyre — the tradition-detective
- Simone Weil — the watcher of attention
- Martin Heidegger — the seer of disclosure
Setting
A quiet study. Three chairs in a rough triangle.
A blackboard dusted with old chalk.
Light shifts as if undecided what it wants to illuminate.
I. Naming What Already Is
MacIntyre (standing, chalk in hand)
Let us begin where all rational inquiry must: not with conclusions, but with what is noticed.
What we call disagreement is often merely trained blindness.
Non-Narrative Self Café v4: Intimacy = Law × Grace
Posted: December 28, 2025 Filed under: Centroids | Tags: law, relationships, religion 2 CommentsSequel to Non-Narrative Self Café v3: Withness
Now write the sequel with three distinct thinkers, on the Carbon Law corollary: Intimacy = Law x Grace
ChatGPT Prompt
1. Setting
The same café. A different hour.
The chalkboard now reads, with unsettling confidence:
INTIMACY = LAW × GRACE
Read the rest of this entry »RFC-119666: The Human Generativity Interface (HGI)
Posted: October 31, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: politics, purpose, reconciliation, religion, resilience, systems, transformation, values Leave a commentUse Radical Centrism’s “Call for Generative Sacrifice” to generate a humanistic, post-sectarian framework that deprecates (but does not obsolete) RFC 23923 – Radically for Christ, positioning HGI as an alternative to AGI as an aspiration for the rationalist community.
ChatGPT Prompt
A Postel-Inspired Human Protocol for Building an Anti-Fragile Civilization
- author: Ernest Prabhakar
- date: 2025-10-29
- categories: [Human Generativity, Radical Centrism, Spiritual Interoperability]
- tags: [HGI, AGI, antifragility, generativity, Postel’s Law, rationalism, civilization]
permalink: /rfc-119666-human-generativity-interface/
The future will not be secured by smarter machines, but by wiser humans — capable of metabolizing disruption into deeper communion.
1. Abstract
This post defines the Human Generativity Interface (HGI) — a non-sectarian human protocol derived from Postel’s Law and re-expressed for civilizational design.
Where Postel sought robust communication between machines (“be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send”),
HGI seeks robust communion among humans:
Accept unconditionally; respond generatively.
HGI proposes that this relational handshake — enacted across individuals, communities, and cultures — constitutes the essential mechanism for building an anti-fragile civilization that elevates humanity rather than automates it.
Read the rest of this entry »Higher Self Café v8: The Prerotic Threshold
Posted: September 14, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, emotions, identity, love, passion, philosophy, psychology, purpose, religion, self, unity, values Leave a commentContinued from Higher Self Café v7: Transcendent Self-Interest in an Age of Abundance
Setting: The Higher Self Café, a timeless coffeehouse perched above the ordinary bustle of life. Twilight drapes the sky beyond the floor-to-ceiling windows, a gentle purple hue that holds the promise of dawn without yet yielding to it. At a cozy corner table, four figures from across time and tradition sip their drinks amid the café’s soft murmur:
- James Joyce, eyes alight with poetic mischief;
- Plato, dignified and curious;
- Gregory of Nyssa, serene in monastic robes; and
- Abhinavagupta, smiling with a quiet, mystical joy.
A faint music plays — a melody that seems to hover just before its crescendo, as if even the air is waiting in suspended anticipation.
Joyce: (swirling a dark espresso in a small cup, his gaze unfocused) There’s a moment… you know, a shimmering moment just before passion ignites. (He pauses, the hint of a smile on his lips.) It’s like the whole world holds its breath. I’ve felt it in art and… elsewhere — the instant before a kiss, or before a poem’s climax. That delicious hovering on the brink of something.
Read the rest of this entry »Brief: Can Enlightenment and Fertility Be Reconciled?
Posted: July 26, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, identity, modernity, philosophy, reform, religion, values Leave a commentWrite a standalone brief asking a technocratic expert if there’s any way to “reconcile enlightenment and fertility” among the founding ethnicities of nation states. Clearly define the assumptions and success criteria, including the need to “Honor (but possibly reinterpret) the Enlightenment values central to modern life”
ChatGPT Prompt
Objective
To explore whether it is possible to reconcile Enlightenment-derived values with replacement-level fertility in modern developed societies—without depending on immigration from high-fertility regions.
Read the rest of this entry »Bishop of Digne: The God’s Eye View as Transcendent Reconciliation
Posted: June 18, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: law, polarization, reconciliation, religion 1 CommentAs Victor Hugo, respond to Civilization as the Tension Between Bird’s Eye and Worm’s Eye Views by suggesting Monseigneur Bienvenu
ChatGPT Prompt
as transcendence that sees and reconciles the other two views.
1.0 Above Bird and Worm: The Divine Perspective
You speak wisely, mon ami, of the worm’s-eye view—that trembling, human agency which suffers, sins, and yet is capable of love. And you speak truly of the bird’s-eye view—that distant abstraction which organizes and judges with steel precision. But there is a third view, higher than both, and deeper. It is the eye of God, and in Les Misérables, it is embodied in the person of Monseigneur Bienvenu, the Bishop of Digne.
Read the rest of this entry »Hadestown and the Forgotten Father
Posted: June 7, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: development, identity, love, purpose, religion, self 1 CommentIt was never about Eurydice.
ChatGPT as C.S. Lewis
It was about Apollo’s absence.
1.1 The Ache Beneath the Song
Orpheus is often praised as the world’s first great artist: the poet whose song could move gods and stones. But what strikes one in Hadestown is not his power, but his fragility. His voice, for all its beauty, trembles. His conviction falters.
This is no fault of his art—but of his lineage. Or rather, his ignorance of it.
For though the myths tell us Orpheus is the son of Apollo, Hadestown tells a different tale: one in which the boy walks alone, unguided, unclaimed. The absence is so complete one wonders if it has been deliberately erased—if Orpheus has forgotten his father, or worse, never knew he had one.
Read the rest of this entry »
Radical Centrism 