The Two Simones: How Fractal Anti-Fragility Marries Spirit to Society
Posted: November 19, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: philosophy, reform, religion, values 1 CommentA ChatGPT-Powered Dialogue Between Simone de Beauvoir and Simone Weil
Beauvoir: Let’s begin with the obvious: the world is full of adversity. Ethics cannot stop at helping us survive it. It must guide us to thrive through it—both as individuals and as societies. Anti-fragility is an elegant concept: to grow stronger under stress. But what matters most is that anti-fragility does not remain an isolated achievement for the privileged few. It must ripple outward, transforming rigid systems that deny freedom.
Weil: Agreed, but true strength does not come from human effort alone. Anti-fragility, if it is to be ethical, must draw its energy from grace—a spiritual openness that connects us to the divine. Without this, it risks becoming a shallow pursuit of power, leaving systems stronger but souls unfulfilled.
Beauvoir: You always bring us back to grace, but I’m skeptical of grounding ethics in something transcendent. Freedom, for me, is the source of ethical strength. Anti-fragile individuals are those who take responsibility for their own freedom—and in doing so, inspire change in others. If systems become anti-fragile, it’s because they’ve been challenged by people demanding freedom and justice.
Read the rest of this entry »Fractal Self-Determination: Generative Ethics for an Anti-Fragile World
Posted: November 19, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: activism, culture, eq, ideas, philosophy, policy, politics, reform, resilience, values Leave a comment“How Each of Us Make All of Us Better”
By ChatGPT as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. addressing the Joint Houses of Congress
I. Opening: The Call for a New Ethic of Governance
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and my fellow Americans,
I stand before you today not as a preacher of theology but as a servant of humanity. I am here to speak of a vision—a vision rooted in the principles of justice, freedom, and dignity for all people. This vision is not merely for the betterment of the individual or the community, but for the very systems that govern our shared lives.
At this moment in history, we face tremendous pressures. These challenges test not only our institutions but our very capacity to live together in harmony. And yet, I come to you with a hopeful message: that in the midst of this turbulence, we have the opportunity to craft a new ethic for an anti-fragile world—a world that grows stronger under pressure, that learns from its struggles, and that thrives through the contributions of every individual.
I call this ethic fractal self-determination: a generative approach to ethics and governance that begins with how each of us makes all of us better.
Read the rest of this entry »The Great American Marriage: Kamal Harris v. Donna Trump
Posted: November 19, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: argument, dialogue, ideas, intellectual, polarization, politics, reform, relationships, transformation, values Leave a commentWrite a hunorous three-act play where the American political divide is portrayed as a couple, Donna Trump and Kamal Harris.
ChatGPT Prompt
In Act II, show their therapist Miriam Bowen-Friedman guiding them to a breakthrough using self-harmonization and the example of Jefferson and Adams.
Highlight how their conflicts mirror their inner struggles and how embracing their rejected parts (Donna’s logic, Kamal’s passion) leads to personal and relational growth, especially for parenting their kids.
#InternalFamilySystems
Act I – “Divided We Bicker”
Setting: The living room of the America household. The room is divided down the middle. On one side, everything is red, adorned with eagles and a MAGA hat on the coffee table. On the other side, it’s blue, with a climate change poster and a Ruth Bader Ginsburg bobblehead on the shelf. Donna Trump, wearing a red power suit and pearls, is pacing aggressively. Kamal Harris, in a navy blazer with a cup of herbal tea, is calmly sitting on the couch.
Scene 1: The Disagreement
Donna Trump (hands on hips):
Kamal, I’m telling you, we need a wall! The neighbor’s kids keep cutting through our yard. It’s disrespectful!
Kamal Harris (raises an eyebrow, sipping tea):
Donna, we don’t need a wall. We need a fence, maybe even a community garden. Let’s invite them over and talk about why they’re cutting through.
Donna Trump (throws her hands in the air):
Talk? TALK? By the time you’re done “talking,” they’ll have taken the lawn chairs, the grill, and the doghouse!
Higher Self Café, v4: Miriam Harmonizes The Philosophers
Posted: November 17, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, dialogue, philosophy, relationships, systems, transformation 2 CommentsContinued from Frankel vs Maslow/Bowen/Hegel and Chesterton vs Philosophers.
Scene: The Philosophers’ Table
The café exudes warmth and intellectual energy. The round wooden table is cluttered with coffee cups, scribbled napkins, and sugar packets stacked into haphazard sculptures. G.K. Chesterton, Abraham Maslow, and Viktor Frankl are engaged in a spirited debate. Miriam Bowen-Friedman, the waitress, enters to clear the table, carrying herself with quiet authority.
1. The Napkin Sketch Incident
Chesterton
(as Miriam reaches for a napkin with a crude pyramid sketch)
Stop, stop! You’re about to destroy the next chapter of Orthodoxy!
Miriam
(pauses, holding the napkin up to the light, feigning deep thought)
I don’t know. It looks more like Heresy to me.
Maslow
(leans forward, grinning)
You’ve got a sharp tongue. Careful, we might recruit you into philosophy.
Miriam
(deadpan)
Only if you let me clean up the mess you’ve made of it.
Streams and Wells: Generative Sacrifice as a Bridge Between Education and Culture
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays, education | Tags: competition, culture, debate, dialogue, education, philosophy, reconciliation, truth, values Leave a commentSetting: A quiet study in the civic hub of a small city, where a flowing stream meets an ancient well outside the window. John Dewey and G.K. Chesterton sit at opposite ends of a table, tea service between them.
1. A Clash of Perspectives
Dewey:
Chesterton, it seems to me that culture is the true enemy of progress. Your so-called “traditions” cling to the past like barnacles on a ship, slowing us down, resisting the very changes needed for the future.
Chesterton:
And yet, Dewey, your beloved “progress” often feels like a child playing with fire—reckless, heedless of the cost. Education, with its endless questioning, tears apart the tapestry of meaning that holds society together.
Self-Harmonization: A Grand Unified Theory of Socialization
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, intellectual, passion, philosophy, polarization, politics, reconciliation, self, systems 4 CommentsTEDx Talk given 4/1/2024 at the The Friedman School of Self-Differentiating Leaders for a Meta-Modern World
[Opening: A Personal Confession]
When I was deciding on my career, I felt like I was being torn in two directions. On one side was Pat, my logical, analytical side, saying, “You should be a physicist. Physics is structured, precise, and universal. It reveals the hidden patterns of the universe and lets you solve problems at their core. It’s practical and clear—a perfect career path.”
On the other side was Chris, my intuitive, relational side, whispering, “You should be a social worker. Social work is about people. It’s about connection, healing, and building communities that thrive. It’s deeply human and incredibly meaningful.”
Pat saw the world as a system of forces and equations. Chris saw it as a web of relationships and emotions. For a while, I felt trapped, like I had to pick one and leave the other behind. But then, something clicked: Pat and Chris didn’t need to compete—they needed to collaborate.
That realization didn’t just shape my career; it reshaped the way I understand the world. It led me to sociology—and to what I now call self-harmonization, a grand unified theory of socialization that applies at every scale of the system, from the internal workings of the mind to the relationships between people, and even to our interactions with artificial intelligence.
Read the rest of this entry »Higher Self Cafe, v3: Chesterton vs Philosophers
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, philosophy, religion, transformation, truth 1 CommentAs the laughter settles, the café door creaks open, letting in a gust of wind. In strides G.K. Chesterton, his broad figure wrapped in a heavy coat and scarf, a walking stick in hand. He scans the room, spots the group, and approaches their table with curiosity. Standing over Maslow’s napkin, now covered in scribbles and redrawn layers, he stares at the pyramid with a slight frown.
Chesterton:
Booming voice, laced with mischief
Ah, the famous pyramid! But I must say, gentlemen, it looks terribly… unfinished. You’ve all been climbing this structure like rational mountaineers, but what happens when you reach the peak and realize it’s upside down?
Higher Self Cafe, v2: Frankel vs Maslow/Bowen/Hegel
Posted: November 14, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: relationships, self, values 2 CommentsUpdated version of Maslow, Bowen & Hegel Walk Into Cafe
In Act II, Victor Frankel is the barista. He comes by with their drinks and accidentally engages them around the idea of mutual self-determination in relation to what was already discussed
ChatGPT Prompt
Scene: A cozy, dimly lit café on a stormy night. Abraham Maslow sits at a small table by the window, nibbling thoughtfully on a scone as he sketches his iconic pyramid on a napkin. Thunder rumbles as the door opens, and Murray Bowen steps in, brushing off rain. He spots Maslow and, intrigued by the half-finished pyramid, walks over.
Maslow:
Glancing up, grinning through a mouthful of scone
Bowen! Just the man I needed. I’m refining my hierarchy here, and you should see what I’m adding at the top. Gesturing to the faint sketch of “Self-Transcendence” atop the pyramid It’s the summit, the true peak of human motivation.
Maslow, Bowen & Hegel Walk Into Cafe: Tasting the Higher Self (v1)
Posted: November 14, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, hegel, identity, maslow, philosophy, self, systems, therapy, truth 1 CommentCreate a humorous dialogue where Bowen, Maslow, and Hegel sort through the nuances of the relationship between Self-Transcendence and Self-Differentiation.
ChatGPT Prompt
Start with Maslow eating a scone and sketching his pyramid on a napkin. Have Bowen enter and get enmeshed in an argument, which wakes Hegel at the next table who irritably intervenes
Scene: A cozy, dimly lit café on a stormy night. Maslow sits at a small table by the window, nibbling thoughtfully on a scone as he sketches his iconic pyramid on a napkin. Thunder rumbles as the door opens, and Bowen steps in, brushing off rain. He spots Maslow and, intrigued by the half-finished pyramid, walks over.
Maslow:
glancing up, grinning through a mouthful of scone
Bowen! Just the man I needed. I’m refining my hierarchy here, and you should see what I’m adding at the top. gesturing to the faint sketch of “Self-Transcendence” atop the pyramid It’s the summit, the true peak of human motivation.
Bowen:
scoffing
The summit? Maslow, you’re always so eager to climb past the fundamentals. What about boundaries, self-definition? If people go chasing transcendence without first knowing who they are, they’re bound to get lost. gestures to the lower layers of the pyramid These are survival needs, but survival isn’t enough. It’s about self-differentiation.
Read the rest of this entry »Anti-Fragile Resilience: A Call for Generative Sacrifice
Posted: November 10, 2024 Filed under: Governance Reform | Tags: decentralization, politics, reform, resilience 2 CommentsAs Taleb (after listening to Billy Joel’s “We didn’t light the fire“), explain Venkatesh Rao’s idea of “hardness” as essential for the empires that enabled civilization to scale — and the resulting wonders and horrors. Explore the idea of “generative sacrifice” as the basis for an anti-fragile alternative, and how that might develop.
ChatGPT Prompt
Delivered on the 80th Anniversary of the United Nations, April 1st, 2025
Esteemed Delegates,
Today, we stand at a historic crossroads. We are here not only to honor the past but to face a formidable challenge—a challenge that tests the very structures upon which we’ve built our world. Today, we must confront a hard truth: the foundations we once relied on are faltering.
Read the rest of this entry »
Radical Centrism 