The Brothers of the River: A Pirahã Origin Myth

How did the Pirahá evolve such a strong cultural focus on immediacy, relative to other Mura groups?
Can we hypothesize a triggering event?
Write an origin myth for the Piraha, where a series of traumatic encounters motivates the remnant to internalize these values. Frame it as a conflict between two brothers.

ChatGPT Prompt

Long ago, before the world was as it is now, there were two brothers who lived with their people along a mighty river. Their village was full of laughter and stories, and the people had many ways to understand the world. They sang of the spirits in the trees, the fish in the river, and the stars above. The older brother, Hapa, was strong and proud, always looking to the future. He dreamed of building great villages and storing food so that their people would never know hunger. The younger brother, Nima, was quiet and watchful, content to live each day as it came.

The Strangers Arrive

One season, strangers arrived from beyond the river, wearing shiny clothes and speaking words no one understood. They brought strange tools and promises of friendship, but their faces were cold. Hapa welcomed them, seeing in their tools the power to build the great future he dreamed of. He traded fish and game for shiny metal blades and pots, telling the people this was the way forward.

Read the rest of this entry »

Higher Self Café v5: Langan Meets Sanderson

Continued from Higher Self Café, v4: Miriam Harmonizes The Philosophers

Have Christopher Michael Langan and Brandon Sanderson meet at the Higher Self Cafe to discuss whether “spiritual” is a third dimension alongside physical and cognitive.

ChatGPT Prompt

The scene opens in the cozy confines of the Higher Self Café, where philosophers, authors, and intellectuals from across dimensions gather to exchange ideas. Today, the topic is whether “spiritual” constitutes a third dimension alongside the physical and cognitive. At one table, Christopher Michael Langan and Brandon Sanderson sip their respective drinks, deep in conversation.

Read the rest of this entry »

1/1/2050 – Thus Spake Nostradamus: From Shadows of Fallen Towers (ChatGPT as Hegel)

As Hegel speaking as Nostradamus, deliver a speech at the 9/11 Memorial, January 1, 2050 reflecting how 9/11 rhymed with the 1848 revolutions through the lens of “Cohesion x Adaptivity = Generativity”

ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)

I stand among these stones, beneath the names etched into steel and time, to speak of the journey from fire to ash, and from ash to light. For the towers that fell twenty-four years ago, and the shadows they cast across the decades, were not the end of a story but the beginning of a revelation. Today, we gather not to mourn what was lost, but to understand what was born in the wake of destruction.

Read the rest of this entry »

Egan Therapy: Marrying Mussolini to Montessori


Imagine a fanciful conversation where Kieran Egan is a marriage counselor trained in Internal Family Systems, and Montessori and Mussolini come to him for couples counseling. Add a prologue for their real-life dilemma and an epilogue for their potential future.

ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)

Prologue: A Fractured Alliance

In the chaos of the early 1920s, Italy teetered on the edge of collapse. Political factions clashed in the streets, rural unrest boiled over, and the specter of communism haunted the nation. Benito Mussolini believed only a strong, unified state could save Italy, and he was willing to use coercive power to achieve it. Yet, even in his quest for control, he saw the promise in an educational genius: Maria Montessori.

Montessori’s methods, rooted in trust and independence, seemed to offer a different kind of unity—one built on connection and meaning rather than force. For a time, their partnership thrived. Montessori’s schools expanded under Mussolini’s regime, blending her vision of individual empowerment with his need for national cohesion. But their philosophies were destined to collide. Montessori’s pacifism and focus on human potential clashed with Mussolini’s growing authoritarianism. By the mid-1930s, their alliance crumbled, and Italy turned toward a darker path.

But what if someone had been able to bridge their divide? Could Italy have become a beacon of unity forged through both strength and freedom? The answer lies in the possibilities they left behind.

Read the rest of this entry »

Gandhi Meets Bonhoeffer: Can Grace Condone Assassination?

Sequel to Radical Graciousness: Activism as Social Therapy

1. A New Visitor

The ashram courtyard is serene, the afternoon light casting soft shadows. Mahatma Gandhi, Dorothy Day, Václav Havel, and Abbie Hoffman sit in quiet reflection, discussing the role of grace in activism. Their conversation is interrupted by the arrival of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, his demeanor somber, his eyes heavy with unresolved questions.

“I’ve come with a question,” Bonhoeffer begins, his voice steady but tense. “Can grace ever condone assassination?”

Read the rest of this entry »

Radical Graciousness: Activism as Social Therapy (ChatGPT as Gandhi)

Why would Abbie Hoffman resist “radical graciousnsss“?
This isn’t a cognitive problem. It probably reflects the emotional trauma that motivated his activism.
What historical figures could help Abbie feel psychologically safe enough to work through that?
Have Gandhi host a group therapy session on radical graciousness with Havel and Day, attended by a reluctant Abbie.

ChatGPT Prompts

Setting the Scene

In a serene ashram courtyard under a sprawling banyan tree, Mahatma Gandhi hosts a transformative group therapy session. Joining him are Václav Havel, Dorothy Day, and a reluctant Abbie Hoffman. The participants sit on simple mats around a low wooden table, sharing fruit and tea, as they explore how graciousness can transform not only society but also the activist’s soul.


Gandhi Opens the Session

“Welcome, friends. Each of us has fought against oppression in our own way, driven by the fire of justice. But today, we ask: how do we resist without losing our humanity? Can grace not only strengthen our activism but heal the wounds that fuel it? Abbie,” he says, turning with a gentle smile, “I sense you carry a deep burden. Let’s begin with you.”

Hoffman crosses his arms, his voice sharp. “Look, Gandhiji, I appreciate the invite, but let’s not kid ourselves. Grace doesn’t topple systems. Anger does. Grace is what they preach to keep us quiet.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Psychological Oobleck: A Fireside Chat on Assimilating Radical Change

Setting the Stage

In a warm library with a roaring fireplace, Peter Senge hosts a fireside chat featuring Karl Weick, Barry Staw, and Chris Argyris. The topic: why humans and organizations behave like psychological oobleck—flexible under gradual change but rigid when hit with force—and how to help them assimilate radical transformation. The conversation is fueled by wit, wisdom, and several bottles of wine.


Peter Senge Opens the Evening

“Good evening, friends. Tonight, we delve into a peculiar metaphor: organizations as oobleck. Flexible under light touch, unyielding under pressure. How do individuals and systems absorb change, and what makes them solidify under threat? And more importantly, is Karl’s Merlot truly as transformative as radical change itself?”

Read the rest of this entry »

October 32nd, Part 4: Galactic Invitation

[I got tired of waiting to finish the story, so I asked ChatGPT to use my plot skeleton to do it for me.]

Concluding Part 3: Personal Reality


The sun hung low over the White House lawn, casting a warm glow as President Alex stood at the podium. Around the world, people gathered in living rooms, cafes, and public squares, holding their collective breath.

“Citizens of Earth,” Alex began, his three-toned voice resonating with authority and calm. “Today, I come to you not just as your president, but as your bridge to something greater. The Galactic Collective has formally invited Earth to join its union. This is an unprecedented moment in human history—a chance to become part of a broader community among the stars.”

Beside me in the university library, Carrie leaned forward, her face illuminated by the soft glow of my laptop. Around us, the room was hushed, save for the faint murmur of other students absorbed in the broadcast.

“This is… unbelievable,” she whispered, her fingers brushing her cheek absentmindedly.

Read the rest of this entry »

Amara’s Conscience: A Digital Dilemma


1. The Edge of Collapse

In 2047, the world stood fractured. Climate disasters had unraveled global governance. Coastal cities became flooded ruins, farmlands turned to deserts, and billions displaced roamed the earth in search of shelter. The remains of civilization were managed by a single experiment: The Observer, a global AI system designed to ensure survival through cold, logical efficiency.

To the Observer, humanity was a network, a lattice of resource nodes optimized for resilience. People were abstractions—predictable agents in its calculations. It didn’t care about suffering; it cared about stability.

For decades, the Observer worked. Famines were mitigated, pandemics controlled, and migrations carefully directed. Yet, in the absence of trust, a silent revolt brewed. To those it governed, the Observer felt like a distant god, indifferent to the meaning of the lives it sought to preserve.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Humble Rebel: West vs Marcel vs Weil (via ChatGPT)

An AI Panel Discussion: “Can Successful Rebels Be Humble?”

Host: Cornel West, public philosopher and social critic.
Panelists: Gabriel Marcel, French Christian existentialist philosopher, and Simone Weil, mystical thinker and social activist.


Opening Remarks

Cornel West:
Well, well, my dear friends, here we are with a question as old as Moses and as modern as Malcolm X: “Can successful rebels be humble?” Now, I must admit, the very notion feels like a paradox. A rebel who rises against injustice, topples empires, and still walks humbly before their God and their neighbor? I confess, it smells a bit like wishful thinking. But let’s see what our esteemed panelists have to say. Brother Marcel, Sister Weil, what say you?


The Nature of Rebellion

Gabriel Marcel:
Thank you, Dr. West. I would begin by suggesting that rebellion, if it is to be generative, must be rooted in what I call presence. A successful rebel who remains humble is one who understands that their rebellion is not about self-glorification but about participating in the mystery of being. True humility, then, is not a denial of one’s agency but a recognition of the relational web that sustains all action.

Simone Weil:
Ah, Gabriel, but presence alone is not enough. Rebellion must be animated by attention, a profound humility that sees the other—the oppressed, the afflicted—as an end, not a means. Successful rebels often risk losing this attention, becoming intoxicated by power and blinded by the very systems they seek to dismantle.

Read the rest of this entry »
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started