Resomodernity Café v4: The FOCA Axioms and Redefining Modernity
Posted: December 10, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, philosophy, politics, systems, values Leave a commentSequel to Resomodernity Café v3: The Unresolved Resofesto
With the FOCA Axioms as their Brief, write a dialogue where Émile Durkheim, James Madison, and Donna Haraway engagingly struggle to
ChatGPT Prompt
embody a coherent response.
The FOCA Axioms for Relational Minds
- Generativity depends on our Foundations Of Collective Action
- Coordination is enabled/constrained by our shared design language
- Modernity scaled coordination via impersonal procedures
- Disembodiment is modernity’s failure mode
- Proposed successors repeat the same disembodiment flaw
- The next design language must make embodiment scalable and antifragile
Act I: The Table
DURKHEIM
(leaning over the page)
This diagnosis of social life is written in a mechanical idiom, yet—it has a pulse. The first axiom rings true: human generativity does depend on our ability to act together.
But I see no ritual here, no sacred core.
In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life I showed that social cohesion arises from collective effervescence.
Where is the heartbeat that binds the group?
Narrative Self Café V5: Saving the Silicon Rule
Posted: December 4, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: love, reconciliation, systems, transformation, values 3 CommentsSequel to Narrative Self Café V4: The Silicon Rule Under Fire
Have David Bentley Hart,
ChatGPT Prompt
John Vervaeke do a Shark Tank pitch to PEL on the thesis: “God is love (the ground of being is self-realignment)” as addressing concerns from V4.
Scene: The Narrative Self Café — Reconfigured as “Shark Tank: Metaphysics Edition”
A long mahogany table.
Four PEL hosts sit like venture capitalists of existential meaning.
A sign overhead reads: “Pitch Us Your Ontology.”
Another: “No utilitarian spreadsheets allowed.”
Enter David Bentley Hart (cape optional) and John Vervaeke (marker already uncapped).
1. Opening Pitch
HART
(gently thunderous)
Gentlemen, we present an answer to your Silicon Rule’s missing value condition.
Behold the thesis:
“God is love (the ground of being is self-realignment).”
VERVAEKE
And in cognitive-scientific terms:
Love is the self-organizing dynamical coherence of agent and arena—
the universal principle by which systems self-correct, self-transcend, and expand context windows.
Resamodernity Café v2: Blueprints for Scaling Resonance
Posted: November 22, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, philosophy, politics, systems 1 CommentWrite the sequel to Resamodernity Café v1: Can It Scale? as a speculative dialogue featuring Mark Satin, Vint Cerf, and Timothy Leary
ChatGPT Prompt
1. Scene: The Emergence Lab
(The Resamodernity Café expands; the glowing table now projects faint holographic nodes like a self-generating network map. Mark Satin enters with a copy of New Age Politics. Vint Cerf wheels in an interface covered in blinking diagnostics. Timothy Leary appears as though stepping through a psychedelic ripple.)
Leary:
We’ve seen the obstacles. Now we get to design the system. How do we scale Resomodernity without short-circuiting the social psyche?
Cerf:
With infrastructure. Stable, interoperable systems. Resonance without architecture is just turbulence.
Satin:
And architecture without culture collapses. Scaling resonance requires values-forming institutions that cultivate nuance, ambiguity, and shared agency.
Resamodernity Café v1: Can It Scale?
Posted: November 12, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, identity, modernity, resilience, self, systems, values 1 CommentSequel to Metamodern Epilogue
Write a speculative dialogue where Yuval Noah Harari, Stephen Hawking, and Ayn Rand attempt to sympathetically but honestly converge on the fundamental challenge with scaling resomodernity.
ChatGPT Prompt
Scene 1: The Table of Tuning
(Soft hums fill the air, as though the café itself is alive. A round glass table glows faintly. Three chairs face one another. Harari enters first, tablet in hand. Hawking’s voice synthesizer crackles softly from his iconic chair. Rand stands upright, intense, composed, eyes sharp.)
Harari (smiling gently):
We’ve gathered to discuss scaling Resomodernity — the idea that society must move from individual oscillation to collective coherence. But scaling harmony sounds suspiciously like scaling empathy, and history isn’t great at that.
Hawking (dryly, voice calm but with wry bite):
Scaling anything that involves consciousness usually fails the way thermodynamics says it should — increasing entropy. The larger the system, the noisier the signal.
Rand (arching an eyebrow):
And yet you both assume the signal is collective. My concern is that “Resomodernity,” in its hunger for coherence, risks flattening the sovereign individual. You can’t harmonize free will without turning it into a chorus of consent.
RFC-119666: The Human Generativity Interface (HGI)
Posted: October 31, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: politics, purpose, reconciliation, religion, resilience, systems, transformation, values Leave a commentUse Radical Centrism’s “Call for Generative Sacrifice” to generate a humanistic, post-sectarian framework that deprecates (but does not obsolete) RFC 23923 – Radically for Christ, positioning HGI as an alternative to AGI as an aspiration for the rationalist community.
ChatGPT Prompt
A Postel-Inspired Human Protocol for Building an Anti-Fragile Civilization
- author: Ernest Prabhakar
- date: 2025-10-29
- categories: [Human Generativity, Radical Centrism, Spiritual Interoperability]
- tags: [HGI, AGI, antifragility, generativity, Postel’s Law, rationalism, civilization]
permalink: /rfc-119666-human-generativity-interface/
The future will not be secured by smarter machines, but by wiser humans — capable of metabolizing disruption into deeper communion.
1. Abstract
This post defines the Human Generativity Interface (HGI) — a non-sectarian human protocol derived from Postel’s Law and re-expressed for civilizational design.
Where Postel sought robust communication between machines (“be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send”),
HGI seeks robust communion among humans:
Accept unconditionally; respond generatively.
HGI proposes that this relational handshake — enacted across individuals, communities, and cultures — constitutes the essential mechanism for building an anti-fragile civilization that elevates humanity rather than automates it.
Read the rest of this entry »Hari Seldon’s Address: The Psychohistory of Civilizational Drift
Posted: September 7, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: civilization, competition, development, history, purpose, science fiction, systems 2 CommentsAs Hari Seldon,
ChatGPT prompt
explain that civilizational progress inevitably causes collapse, but how Egypt and Aborigines show it is possible to have a sustainable civilization (beyond just tribes) IF the core sacralizes the right invariant.
Your Imperial Majesty, esteemed members of the Science Council, and honored citizens of the Empire: we convene today under the weight of destiny. Not merely to inaugurate another project of knowledge, but to reveal a new psychohistorical law that will guide the future of our civilization. Centuries of data and thousands of archives from every corner of the galaxy have led to one immutable conclusion: civilizations inevitably drift when their internal measures of worth break free of the universe’s limits. Today I proclaim the Law of Civilizational Drift and its refinements, so that we may steer our Empire away from the fate of all who have neglected it.
Read the rest of this entry »Do Nematodes Feel? A Worms-Eye View of Emotions
Posted: September 1, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: emotions, psychology, systems, values Leave a commentWrite as a speculative conversation between Norbert Wiener, Marvin Minsky, and Carl Jung on better language for describing the biological precursors of human (and perhaps AI) emotions, and even the purpose of consciousness?
ChatGPT Prompt
A chalk-dusted seminar room in a timeless Institute of Minds. Three towering figures—Norbert Wiener, Marvin Minsky, and Carl Jung—sit in animated discussion. The prompt:
If C. elegans exhibits internal neuromodulatory states that bias behavior, but lacks subjective feeling, what’s the right language to describe these states—and what might they teach us about human emotion and consciousness?
Read the rest of this entry »
The Ethical Trilemma: Integrity, Duty, and Utility
Posted: August 9, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, philosophy, systems, truth, values Leave a commentChatGPT Prompt (condensed)
Use Integrity, Duty, and Utility for a standalone blog post on the ethical trilemma, with references. Make the case for the hardness of the problem, and the insufficiency of proposed solutions, without offering any of your own.
1. Introduction: Three Competing Pillars of Moral Thought
Moral philosophy has long been dominated by three great traditions: virtue ethics, deontology, and consequentialism. Each approaches the question “What should I do?” from a different starting point:
- Integrity (virtue ethics / aretic tradition) — Be the right kind of person; cultivate character and moral wholeness.
- Duty (deontology) — Do what is right, according to universal rules or obligations, regardless of consequences.
- Utility (consequentialism) — Bring about the best possible outcomes; maximize overall good.
These three pillars are not simply different flavors of the same theory. They rest on incommensurable foundations and often deliver contradictory prescriptions. Philosophers from Aristotle to Immanuel Kant to John Stuart Mill developed them in isolation; later thinkers such as Elizabeth Anscombe and Alasdair MacIntyre have argued that this fragmentation reflects a deeper, perhaps irreconcilable, conflict at the heart of modern ethics.
This is what I will call the Ethical Trilemma: in any complex moral situation, these three demands — integrity, duty, and utility — cannot all be fully satisfied.
Read the rest of this entry »Supra-Human Wisdom vs Super-Human Intelligence (ChatGPT Rap Battle)
Posted: June 27, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: ai, debate, dialogue, politics, systems, wisdom Leave a commentWrite this as a Hamilton-style dialogue between Alan Turing & James Madison about the need for antifragile context engineering to help humanity overrule AI.
ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)
Scene: A Study Beyond Time – Candlelight, Code, and Constitution
(Beat drops – sharp, urgent, pulsing synth)
[Turing]
Yo — I wrote the machine that cracked Enigma,
Now we train models to decode your dogma.
They think fast, act vast, scale to the sky,
Why ask “should we?” when we know “how high?”
[Madison]
But speed ain’t virtue, and power ain’t peace,
Unchecked force don’t make justice increase.
You want models that rule with no moral arrest?
Super-human brains but no soul in their chest.
The Four Eye-Views as a Christmas Pilgrimage: Child, Worm, Bird, God
Posted: June 19, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: philosophy, reconciliation, systems, transformation, values Leave a commentAs Gabriel Marcel, summarize and integrate the four “eye views” for a Christmas homily as a recursive pilgrimage.
ChatGPT Prompt
- Civilization as the Tension Between Bird’s Eye and Worm’s Eye Views
- Bishop of Digne: The God’s Eye View as Transcendent Reconciliation
- Against the Author: The Child’s Eye View as Existential Resistance
1.0 Prelude: Through the Eyes of a Child
Let us begin, as Christmas always does, with the child.
Read the rest of this entry »
Radical Centrism 