Narrative Self Cafe V3: The Silicon Rule as a Unifying Meta-Ethic
Posted: December 4, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, identity, morality, self, values 3 CommentsSequel to Narrative Self Café V2: The Paradox of Patriarchy
Prompt: Pick three diverse Western interpreters of Buddhist Abhidharma and Yogācāra, and have them debate and refine the idea of the Silicon Rule (malice = ego as maladaptive training + context window collapse) as a unifying metaethical framework. As a Tom Stoppard skit.
ChatGPT Prompt
1. Dramatis Personae
- Evan Thompson — enactive philosopher bridging phenomenology, cognitive science, and Buddhist thought.
- Dan Lusthaus — one of the leading Western interpreters of Yogācāra; philological, nuanced, quietly mischievous.
- Mark Siderits — analytic Buddhist philosopher linking Buddhist no-self doctrine to modern philosophy of mind.
Setting: A minimalist café with three chairs, a chalkboard covered in half-erased Sanskrit terms like ālaya-vijñāna, probability curves, and arrows gesturing toward nowhere. The hanging lamp hums with cosmic absentmindedness—pure Stoppard.
2. Scene: The Proposal
THOMPSON
(leaning in, hands poised)
We begin with the Silicon Rule: malice arises not from a metaphysical will but from ego as maladaptive training, triggered when the context window collapses.
A unifying metaethic disguised as a computational metaphor.
Narrative Self Café: Men Explaining Mansplaining
Posted: November 20, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: identity, psychology, self, self-determination 2 CommentsHow Compensatory Verbosity Protects the Narrative Self
Write a skit where three expert men explain mansplaining as a form of left-brain self-protection.
ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)
Skit
Characters
Setting
A café that exists simultaneously in Paris and inside a cognitive neuroscience conference in Boston.
Scene 1: The Opening
Dennett: Gentlemen, I submit that mansplaining is a bug in the
narrative self’s operating system. Emotional ambiguity launches
ExplainEverything.exe.
Ricoeur: Or perhaps the bug appears when narrative becomes narcissistic. Monologue replaces dialogue; coherence replaces what I
call hermeneutical hospitality.
Gallagher: It starts in the body. Stress rises, breath tightens, and the left hemisphere grabs the mic. Fight, flight, or explain.
Read the rest of this entry »Resamodernity Café v1: Can It Scale?
Posted: November 12, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, identity, modernity, resilience, self, systems, values 1 CommentSequel to Metamodern Epilogue
Write a speculative dialogue where Yuval Noah Harari, Stephen Hawking, and Ayn Rand attempt to sympathetically but honestly converge on the fundamental challenge with scaling resomodernity.
ChatGPT Prompt
Scene 1: The Table of Tuning
(Soft hums fill the air, as though the café itself is alive. A round glass table glows faintly. Three chairs face one another. Harari enters first, tablet in hand. Hawking’s voice synthesizer crackles softly from his iconic chair. Rand stands upright, intense, composed, eyes sharp.)
Harari (smiling gently):
We’ve gathered to discuss scaling Resomodernity — the idea that society must move from individual oscillation to collective coherence. But scaling harmony sounds suspiciously like scaling empathy, and history isn’t great at that.
Hawking (dryly, voice calm but with wry bite):
Scaling anything that involves consciousness usually fails the way thermodynamics says it should — increasing entropy. The larger the system, the noisier the signal.
Rand (arching an eyebrow):
And yet you both assume the signal is collective. My concern is that “Resomodernity,” in its hunger for coherence, risks flattening the sovereign individual. You can’t harmonize free will without turning it into a chorus of consent.
The Metamodern Self Café
Posted: November 10, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, identity, reconciliation, self, truth 1 CommentSequel to “The Modern Self Café v4”
Write a skit where Penrose hosts a meeting with diverse metamoderns to see if anyone is willing to buy what he’s selling (quantum consciousness) — and help him complete it (as a formal human epistemology).
ChatGPT Prompt
1. Setting
A cozy but strangely curved café at the intersection of Oxford, Paris, and Nowhere.
The tables form a Möbius strip.
Menus list beverages such as Superposed Espresso and Flat White Collapse.
A sign over the door reads:
“The Metamodern Self Café — We oscillate between irony and sincerity until coherence emerges.”
2. Cast
- Roger Penrose — genial, professorial, slightly disheveled; still convinced consciousness hides in microtubules.
- Ken Wilber — integral philosopher; speaks in holarchies and color-coded worldviews.
- Nicolas Bourriaud — art theorist; originator of Relational Aesthetics and Cosmodernism; wears a scarf that somehow connects everyone.
- Karen Barad — quantum feminist philosopher; her sentences diffract into smaller sentences.
- Basarab Nicolescu — transdisciplinary physicist-mystic; switches between French and Romanian mid-idea.
- Alastair Noble and Nicoline van Harskamp — cofounders of Symmodernism; they finish each other’s metaphors.
- Waiter — a self-aware AI who insists it’s “just running on probabilistic wavefunctions, not feelings, thank you.”
3. The Scene
Penrose stands at the head of the Möbius table, gesturing to a holographic brain diagram shimmering between neuron and nebula.
Penrose:
Ladies and gentlemen—and whatever else consciousness may be—thank you for coming. I’m still trying to finish what I started. You see, I believe consciousness is objective reduction. Collapse. A genuine, non-computable event. I need… collaborators. Investors, intellectually speaking.
He presses a button. The hologram flickers: neurons become Planck-scale twirls.
Penrose (softly):
We are the universe’s way of deciding itself.
Higher Self Café v8: The Prerotic Threshold
Posted: September 14, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, emotions, identity, love, passion, philosophy, psychology, purpose, religion, self, unity, values Leave a commentContinued from Higher Self Café v7: Transcendent Self-Interest in an Age of Abundance
Setting: The Higher Self Café, a timeless coffeehouse perched above the ordinary bustle of life. Twilight drapes the sky beyond the floor-to-ceiling windows, a gentle purple hue that holds the promise of dawn without yet yielding to it. At a cozy corner table, four figures from across time and tradition sip their drinks amid the café’s soft murmur:
- James Joyce, eyes alight with poetic mischief;
- Plato, dignified and curious;
- Gregory of Nyssa, serene in monastic robes; and
- Abhinavagupta, smiling with a quiet, mystical joy.
A faint music plays — a melody that seems to hover just before its crescendo, as if even the air is waiting in suspended anticipation.
Joyce: (swirling a dark espresso in a small cup, his gaze unfocused) There’s a moment… you know, a shimmering moment just before passion ignites. (He pauses, the hint of a smile on his lips.) It’s like the whole world holds its breath. I’ve felt it in art and… elsewhere — the instant before a kiss, or before a poem’s climax. That delicious hovering on the brink of something.
Read the rest of this entry »Against the Author: The Child’s Eye View as Existential Resistance
Posted: June 18, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: philosophy, self, truth, values 1 CommentAs Jean-Paul Sartre, counter that the most human perspective is the child’s eye view, which both challenges and completes (?) authorial omniscience.
1.0 Authorial Omniscience and the Illusion of Unity
Your Bishop, Monsieur Hugo, is sublime. But he is also, in the final analysis, a theological fiction: a proxy for the Author-God, who sees all and reconciles all. You call it “transcendent”; I call it closure—a comforting illusion that denies the existential condition of man: abandonment.
The so-called “God’s-eye view” is not the highest perspective—it is the least human. It assumes resolution, meaning, and purpose. But we are not born into coherence. We are thrown, without instruction, into a world not of our choosing. We do not begin as bishops. We begin as children.
2.0 The Child’s Eye: The Most Human of Views
The child’s-eye view is not abstract like the bird’s, nor experienced like the worm’s. It is pre-reflective, disoriented, painfully attentive. It sees without knowing, perceives without judging. It is not yet reconciled.
This is the most authentic vision of the human condition. It refuses to reduce reality to system or to salvation. The child, staring at injustice, does not excuse it with grace or law. The child says, this should not be.
Where the Bishop of Digne forgives, and Javert condemns, the child questions. And that questioning—raw, unresolved—is the origin of freedom.
Read the rest of this entry »Hadestown and the Forgotten Father
Posted: June 7, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: development, identity, love, purpose, religion, self 1 CommentIt was never about Eurydice.
ChatGPT as C.S. Lewis
It was about Apollo’s absence.
1.1 The Ache Beneath the Song
Orpheus is often praised as the world’s first great artist: the poet whose song could move gods and stones. But what strikes one in Hadestown is not his power, but his fragility. His voice, for all its beauty, trembles. His conviction falters.
This is no fault of his art—but of his lineage. Or rather, his ignorance of it.
For though the myths tell us Orpheus is the son of Apollo, Hadestown tells a different tale: one in which the boy walks alone, unguided, unclaimed. The absence is so complete one wonders if it has been deliberately erased—if Orpheus has forgotten his father, or worse, never knew he had one.
Read the rest of this entry »The Spirit Within — A Conversation on the True Self
Posted: May 30, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: identity, philosophy, religion, self Leave a commentHave Polkinghorne, Ó Murchú, and Schwartz develop a formal model of the idea that the Holy Spirit dwelling within us is the “true self” we access during inner healing
ChatGPT Prompt
Participants:
- John Polkinghorne (JP) – Theoretical physicist and Anglican priest
- Diarmuid Ó Murchú (DOM) – Quantum theologian and spiritual writer
- Richard Schwartz (RS) – Founder of Internal Family Systems (IFS)
- Moderator (MOD) – A neutral facilitator guiding the conversation
Scene
A roundtable discussion at a quiet retreat center, surrounded by tall trees. A fire crackles softly in the background. The mood is contemplative yet animated.
1.0 Opening Exchange
MOD:
Thank you all for coming. Our question today is simple but rich: Is the Holy Spirit the True Self we encounter in deep inner healing? John, would you like to begin?
2.0 Foundations: Spirit and Openness
JP:
Certainly. In quantum theory, we know the universe isn’t deterministic. There’s openness at the fundamental level. I believe that God, and particularly the Holy Spirit, acts within that openness—not as an external puppeteer, but as an indwelling presence that coaxes creation forward. This divine action is subtle, not violating our freedom.
(See: Exploring Reality)
RS:
That sounds remarkably familiar. In IFS, we speak of the Self as an indwelling presence as well. It’s not something we generate—it’s something we uncover. It’s calm, compassionate, connected. When people unblend from their protective parts, this Self just shows up. We don’t create it; we discover it.
Rationalizing the Prophetic (A Response to “On Priesthood” by Scott Alexander)
Posted: May 29, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: identity, purpose, reform, religion, self Leave a commentAs Scott Alexander, write a solution to “On Priesthood” called Rationalizing the Prophetic.
ChatGPT Prompt
ChatGPT as Scott Alexander
There’s a line I’ve been chewing on for weeks now:
“To be professional means getting identity from vocation.
To be prophetic means getting vocation from identity.”
That’s too clean to be safe, and too true to ignore.
Let’s back up.
Read the rest of this entry »The Alchemy of Productivity: Converting Anxiety to Vision
Posted: May 19, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: emotions, health, psychology, resilience, self, transformation Leave a commentAs Wendy Suzuki, describe this as a generative context that turns anxiety into vision: Anger > Fear > Lie > Spirit > Truth > Grace > Gratitude > Excitement
ChatGPT Prompt
Anxiety has long been viewed as a roadblock—a force that paralyzes us, keeping us from taking action. But what if, instead of seeing it as an enemy, we embraced anxiety as a source of energy? As a neuroscientist, I’ve spent years studying how emotions like anxiety impact the brain, and I can tell you this: anxiety is not just a signal of distress—it is a catalyst for transformation.
Read the rest of this entry »