Fractal Self-Determination: Generative Ethics for an Anti-Fragile World
Posted: November 19, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: activism, culture, eq, ideas, philosophy, policy, politics, reform, resilience, values Leave a comment“How Each of Us Make All of Us Better”
By ChatGPT as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. addressing the Joint Houses of Congress
I. Opening: The Call for a New Ethic of Governance
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, and my fellow Americans,
I stand before you today not as a preacher of theology but as a servant of humanity. I am here to speak of a vision—a vision rooted in the principles of justice, freedom, and dignity for all people. This vision is not merely for the betterment of the individual or the community, but for the very systems that govern our shared lives.
At this moment in history, we face tremendous pressures. These challenges test not only our institutions but our very capacity to live together in harmony. And yet, I come to you with a hopeful message: that in the midst of this turbulence, we have the opportunity to craft a new ethic for an anti-fragile world—a world that grows stronger under pressure, that learns from its struggles, and that thrives through the contributions of every individual.
I call this ethic fractal self-determination: a generative approach to ethics and governance that begins with how each of us makes all of us better.
Read the rest of this entry »Higher Self Café, v4: Miriam Harmonizes The Philosophers
Posted: November 17, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, dialogue, philosophy, relationships, systems, transformation 2 CommentsContinued from Frankel vs Maslow/Bowen/Hegel and Chesterton vs Philosophers.
Scene: The Philosophers’ Table
The café exudes warmth and intellectual energy. The round wooden table is cluttered with coffee cups, scribbled napkins, and sugar packets stacked into haphazard sculptures. G.K. Chesterton, Abraham Maslow, and Viktor Frankl are engaged in a spirited debate. Miriam Bowen-Friedman, the waitress, enters to clear the table, carrying herself with quiet authority.
1. The Napkin Sketch Incident
Chesterton
(as Miriam reaches for a napkin with a crude pyramid sketch)
Stop, stop! You’re about to destroy the next chapter of Orthodoxy!
Miriam
(pauses, holding the napkin up to the light, feigning deep thought)
I don’t know. It looks more like Heresy to me.
Maslow
(leans forward, grinning)
You’ve got a sharp tongue. Careful, we might recruit you into philosophy.
Miriam
(deadpan)
Only if you let me clean up the mess you’ve made of it.
Streams and Wells: Generative Sacrifice as a Bridge Between Education and Culture
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays, education | Tags: competition, culture, debate, dialogue, education, philosophy, reconciliation, truth, values Leave a commentSetting: A quiet study in the civic hub of a small city, where a flowing stream meets an ancient well outside the window. John Dewey and G.K. Chesterton sit at opposite ends of a table, tea service between them.
1. A Clash of Perspectives
Dewey:
Chesterton, it seems to me that culture is the true enemy of progress. Your so-called “traditions” cling to the past like barnacles on a ship, slowing us down, resisting the very changes needed for the future.
Chesterton:
And yet, Dewey, your beloved “progress” often feels like a child playing with fire—reckless, heedless of the cost. Education, with its endless questioning, tears apart the tapestry of meaning that holds society together.
Self-Harmonization: A Grand Unified Theory of Socialization
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, intellectual, passion, philosophy, polarization, politics, reconciliation, self, systems 4 CommentsTEDx Talk given 4/1/2024 at the The Friedman School of Self-Differentiating Leaders for a Meta-Modern World
[Opening: A Personal Confession]
When I was deciding on my career, I felt like I was being torn in two directions. On one side was Pat, my logical, analytical side, saying, “You should be a physicist. Physics is structured, precise, and universal. It reveals the hidden patterns of the universe and lets you solve problems at their core. It’s practical and clear—a perfect career path.”
On the other side was Chris, my intuitive, relational side, whispering, “You should be a social worker. Social work is about people. It’s about connection, healing, and building communities that thrive. It’s deeply human and incredibly meaningful.”
Pat saw the world as a system of forces and equations. Chris saw it as a web of relationships and emotions. For a while, I felt trapped, like I had to pick one and leave the other behind. But then, something clicked: Pat and Chris didn’t need to compete—they needed to collaborate.
That realization didn’t just shape my career; it reshaped the way I understand the world. It led me to sociology—and to what I now call self-harmonization, a grand unified theory of socialization that applies at every scale of the system, from the internal workings of the mind to the relationships between people, and even to our interactions with artificial intelligence.
Read the rest of this entry »Higher Self Cafe, v3: Chesterton vs Philosophers
Posted: November 16, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, philosophy, religion, transformation, truth 1 CommentAs the laughter settles, the café door creaks open, letting in a gust of wind. In strides G.K. Chesterton, his broad figure wrapped in a heavy coat and scarf, a walking stick in hand. He scans the room, spots the group, and approaches their table with curiosity. Standing over Maslow’s napkin, now covered in scribbles and redrawn layers, he stares at the pyramid with a slight frown.
Chesterton:
Booming voice, laced with mischief
Ah, the famous pyramid! But I must say, gentlemen, it looks terribly… unfinished. You’ve all been climbing this structure like rational mountaineers, but what happens when you reach the peak and realize it’s upside down?
Maslow, Bowen & Hegel Walk Into Cafe: Tasting the Higher Self (v1)
Posted: November 14, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, hegel, identity, maslow, philosophy, self, systems, therapy, truth 1 CommentCreate a humorous dialogue where Bowen, Maslow, and Hegel sort through the nuances of the relationship between Self-Transcendence and Self-Differentiation.
ChatGPT Prompt
Start with Maslow eating a scone and sketching his pyramid on a napkin. Have Bowen enter and get enmeshed in an argument, which wakes Hegel at the next table who irritably intervenes
Scene: A cozy, dimly lit café on a stormy night. Maslow sits at a small table by the window, nibbling thoughtfully on a scone as he sketches his iconic pyramid on a napkin. Thunder rumbles as the door opens, and Bowen steps in, brushing off rain. He spots Maslow and, intrigued by the half-finished pyramid, walks over.
Maslow:
glancing up, grinning through a mouthful of scone
Bowen! Just the man I needed. I’m refining my hierarchy here, and you should see what I’m adding at the top. gesturing to the faint sketch of “Self-Transcendence” atop the pyramid It’s the summit, the true peak of human motivation.
Bowen:
scoffing
The summit? Maslow, you’re always so eager to climb past the fundamentals. What about boundaries, self-definition? If people go chasing transcendence without first knowing who they are, they’re bound to get lost. gestures to the lower layers of the pyramid These are survival needs, but survival isn’t enough. It’s about self-differentiation.
Read the rest of this entry »The Chronicles of Hither and Yon: The Quest for the Included Middle
Posted: November 9, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, philosophy, transformation Leave a commentFADE IN:
INT. VILLAGE OF HITHERION – TOWN SQUARE – DAY
Villagers bustle about in a neat, orderly square split right down the middle. On one side, EVERYTHING IS BRIGHT AND WHITE; on the other side, DARK AND SHADOWY.
NARRATOR (V.O.)
Once upon a time, in the curious land of Hitherion, there was no such thing as “maybe.” You were either on one side or the other – Absolutely or Absolutely Not.
We see a young boy, EDMUND (late teens, awkward but curious), standing by the LINE that divides the town in two. He squints at the swirling mist that runs down the center of the square, a magical boundary called THE LINE.
Read the rest of this entry »The Grace of the Included Middle
Posted: November 9, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, dialogue, philosophy, polarization, reconciliation, religion, values Leave a commentChatGPT as Brendan Graham Dempsey
In the age of polarization, divisive ideologies, and unyielding binaries, we find ourselves in need of a profound shift in thinking—a shift that allows us to embrace paradox, complexity, and, most importantly, the grace of what I call the Included Middle. This concept does not merely lie between opposing viewpoints but occupies a space that is both-and: a creative middle that holds the tension of opposites in transformative ways. Embracing the Included Middle offers not just a strategy for navigating our complex age but an invitation to a deeper, more compassionate mode of existence.
Theologically and culturally, this approach represents a metamodern response to postmodern fragmentation. Where postmodernism often focused on deconstruction, identifying every boundary and category as a potential power play, metamodernism seeks synthesis, oscillating between structures rather than dismantling them entirely. Within this framework, the Included Middle is a profoundly sacred space—a space that mirrors the inclusive, reconciling grace we seek to embody in our fractured world.
Read the rest of this entry »Ultimate Harmony
Posted: August 16, 2020 Filed under: Governance Reform | Tags: culture, economics, education, health, philosophy, politics, psychology, reform, religion, systems, transformation Leave a commentThe ultimate purpose and measure of mental, emotional, and spiritual health is a Harmonious Self, where each Part relates constructively to the Other.
The ultimate purpose and measure of political, economic, and cultural health is a similarly Harmonious Society.
The ultimate purpose and measure of parenting, education and religion is our ability to become Harmonious Selves who co-construct more Harmonious Societies. Read the rest of this entry »
Truth Bowl CQ 2019-03-20 Free Speech with Consequences
Posted: March 11, 2019 Filed under: Truth Bowl | Tags: debate, education, philosophy, politics, protest 1 CommentChallenge Question for V2 of Truth Bowl (the ad hoc version)
You are a professor of philosophy at a large university. You’ve just received a panicky phone call from your former schoolmate Pat, the chair of humanities at a struggling liberal arts college out East. You vaguely remember hearing the school brought in an investment banker alum as president to pull off a turnaround. Pat informs you that said banker has invited a controversial book author to campus as a publicity stunt, and in one hour Pat is expected to face that author in some sort of debate.
Pat (and you) have never read the book or heard the author speak. However, many of your peers consider him a right-wing reactionary with the ear of Trump, who wants to abolish modern education and replace universities with some sort of theocratic communes. Previous invitations for him to speak at major universities have been rescinded due to outraged protests by students and faculties. That’s probably why this college president jumped at the chance to gain notoriety as the first school to host the author — and didn’t tell anyone until the last minute.
Several colleagues have urged Pat to quit and boycott the event, since it feels like a setup; better to be a martyr than risk legitimizing someone who seems both willing and able to destroy everything they stand for.
There isn’t much time. The only background material you have to go on is one relatively balanced book review.
Challenge Question: What advice would you give Pat, and why?
Options include (but are not limited to):
– Directly engaging with / critiquing (the ideas of) the author
– Proposing a debate format that would ensure Pat’s views get a fair hearing, despite the lack of preparation (Pat has enough authority to dictate the format, but not enough to escape the debate )
– Providing a clear rationale why it is Pat’s moral duty to boycott the event
Radical Centrism 