Remix: The Next Jazz Age (ChatGPT as F. Scott Fitzgerald)


Have the ghost of F Scott Fitzgerald speak at The Plaza Hotel on the exact centennial of The Great Gatsby, reflecting on how the Jazz Age marked a shift from top-down/elder to bottom-up/youth culture.
Muse optimistically how the upcoming Age of Remix could herald a similar shift to an inside-out culture of “perpetual adolescence” (in both positive and negative senses of continual self-creation). 

ChatGPT Prompt

Scene: The Grand Ballroom of The Plaza Hotel, New York City. The date is April 10, 2025, precisely 100 years after the publication of The Great Gatsby. A gentle glow fills the room, and the ghost of F. Scott Fitzgerald appears, his figure refined and luminous, dressed in his Jazz Age finery. He approaches the podium, the timeless elegance of the space mirroring the timelessness of his words.


F. Scott Fitzgerald:
Ladies and gentlemen,

One hundred years ago, I offered the world a story—a slender book, simple in its telling, but complex in its reflection of a moment when the tides of culture began to shift. The Great Gatsby was born from the Jazz Age, an era where the old world—dominated by elder authority and inherited tradition—gave way to a vibrant, uncontainable culture driven by youth. The top-down society of my parents’ generation crumbled, replaced by the daring, pulsating rhythms of jazz, the shimmer of sequins in dimly lit speakeasies, and the bold defiance of young women in bobbed hair and short skirts.

The Jazz Age was a turning point, a revolt against the weight of history and a celebration of creation from the ground up. It was a time when young people became the architects of culture, when their music, their ideals, and even their recklessness reshaped the world. But as I stand here, gazing across the veil of time into your era, I sense that another transformation is on the horizon.

Read the rest of this entry »

The First Starlighter (Last Starfighter, Christmas Edition)

Storyboard a Christmas retelling of The Last Starfighter where Alex helps an angry Xur reconcile with his father and heal the Star League’s political insularity, which mirrors Xur’s emotional neglect.

ChatGPT Prompt

Overview

In this version, father and son reconcile place aboard a stripped-down Starfighter, rechristened as the Starlighter, symbolizing renewal and unity. The story explicitly ties Xur’s personal grievances with the Star League’s insularity and dysfunction, ending with systemic reform and the birth of the Starlighters.


1. Opening: The Fractured Galaxy

  • Scene 1: Alex’s Small-Town Christmas
    Alex Rogan, feeling isolated and yearning for a greater purpose, beats the Starfighter arcade game. Centauri arrives and introduces him to the galactic conflict. Centauri explains that the Star League is crumbling under the weight of its insular leadership, mirrored by Enduran’s strained relationship with his son, Xur.
    Theme: The Star League’s inability to adapt and connect parallels Xur’s feelings of abandonment.
  • Scene 2: Xur’s Declaration of War
    Xur delivers a broadcast declaring the Star League obsolete, blaming its leadership for neglecting the needs of the galaxy’s outer systems. He vows to tear it down and create a new order that serves all worlds equally.
    Foreshadowing: Xur’s rhetoric reflects legitimate grievances, but his anger at his father clouds his judgment.
Read the rest of this entry »

Modern Self Café v4: Aaronson, Damasio, and Penrose

Write a sequel to Modern Self Café v3: with three contemporary researchers of consciousness

ChatGPT Prompt

Setting: A sleek modern café, softly lit, with floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking a bustling city. The café hums with quiet activity as three thinkers—Scott Aaronson, Antonio Damasio, and Roger Penrose—sit at a corner table. Their discussion spans the limits of computation, the nature of consciousness, and the mysteries of the universe.


Aaronson: (gesturing animatedly with his coffee cup) I’ve spent my career trying to pin down what’s computationally possible. Quantum computers, for instance—they’re not magic, just machines working within the laws of physics. But here’s what nags at me: even with quantum computing, are there problems that lie beyond the reach of all algorithms, forever?

Penrose: (smiling, leaning back slightly) That’s precisely the question that keeps me awake at night, Scott. You see, my work on the non-computability of human consciousness suggests that the mind itself might operate beyond algorithmic constraints. The universe might not be a machine at all—it could hold processes we don’t yet understand.

Read the rest of this entry »

Modern Self Café v3: Gödel, Einstein, Wittgenstein, and Simone

Continued from Modern Self Café v2: Kant Goethe There

Write the sequel, with dramatic embellishments for more emotional depth.

ChatGPT Prompt

Setting: A cozy café in Vienna in the mid-20th century. The café is warmly lit, bustling softly in the background, but at one corner table, the air crackles with tension. Kurt Gödel, Albert Einstein, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Simone de Beauvoir are engaged in an intense discussion. A half-drunk coffee cup with a faint crack sits at the center of the table, a quiet metaphor for the limits of understanding.


Einstein: (leaning forward, tapping a spoon on the cracked cup) I’ll say it again: the universe is orderly. Beneath all this chaos—quantum mechanics, human indecision, even linguistic paradoxes—there must be a unified, elegant truth.

Gödel: (quietly, yet resolute) But Albert, even if such a truth exists, how can you know it’s accessible to us? My incompleteness theorem shows that even within our most rigorous systems, there are truths that cannot be proven. Certainty is always incomplete.

Einstein: (frowning) Then what, Kurt? We should just give up? I’ve spent my life seeking simplicity in the complexity of space and time. Without that belief, what’s the point of any of it?

Read the rest of this entry »

Modern Self Café v2: Kant Goethe There

Continued from Modern Self Café: Galileo, Descartes, Mersenne


Imagine a similar group set in the time of Kant.

ChatGPT Prompt

Setting: A cozy salon in Königsberg in the late 18th century. The conversation revolves around the Enlightenment’s intellectual revolution and the transition from Newtonian mechanics and rationalism to Immanuel Kant‘s transcendental idealism. The group includes Kant, Leonhard Euler, Joseph-Louis Lagrange, and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. They discuss how their respective disciplines—philosophy, mathematics, physics, and natural science—are reshaping humanity’s understanding of reality.


Kant: Gentlemen, it strikes me that we are at a crossroads, much like Galileo and Descartes before us. They sought to uncover the laws of nature through reason and observation. But now we must ask: what are the limits of reason itself?

Read the rest of this entry »

Modern Self Café: Galileo, Descartes, Mersenne

A spin-off from Higher Self Café.

Write a dialogue with Galileo, Mersenne, and Descartes that helps moderns understand the mental shift they engineered.

ChatGPT Prompt
Founding Fathers of Science

Setting: A cozy study in Paris in the mid-17th century. Galileo Galilei, Marin Mersenne, and René Descartes are seated around a small table covered with papers, quills, and diagrams. A fire crackles in the hearth. Their conversation revolves around the intellectual shift they helped create—the movement from Aristotelian natural philosophy to the scientific and mathematical worldview that underpins modern science.


Mersenne: Gentlemen, it is humbling to consider the scope of what we are reshaping. The old world thought the cosmos was ruled by purpose and perfection, yet here we are, uncovering truths through measurement, mathematics, and reason.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Tapestry of Reciprocal Leadership

Sequel to How MAET Turns TEAMS Around (and Also Saves Civilization)

Explain the journey of reciprocal leadership using a tapestry viewed from three perspectives: John Gottman, David Marquet, and later Saint Francis. It starts out exciting, but leads to disillusionment.
Then something miraculous happens…

ChatGPT Prompt (greatly condensed)

Act 1: Shared Excitement

Scene: A serene monastery courtyard. The sun casts a golden glow over an ancient stone wall, where a large, intricate tapestry hangs. The label beneath it reads: “Reciprocal Leadership.”

Enter JOHN GOTTMAN, reflective and warm, and DAVID MARQUET, precise and deliberate, from opposite sides of the stage. They stop in front of the tapestry, staring at it curiously.

GOTTMAN (gesturing to the tapestry)
Look at how interconnected it is. Each thread supports the others, like a family—built on trust and shared understanding.

MARQUET (studying the pattern closely)
Interconnected, yes, but orderly. Each thread has a role and direction, like an organization—efficient, driven by clarity and intent.

Read the rest of this entry »

Dancing with Modernity: Falling Gracefully With Meiji Ukemi

Have Jigoro Kano speak on “Meiji Ukemi” at an appropriate historical event, as a metaphor for moving beyond “breakfall” to dance with Western modernity.

ChatGPT Prompt

ChatGPT as Jigoro Kano on October 18, 1888


Your Majesty, esteemed guests, and fellow educators,

We stand here today in an era unlike any other in our nation’s history. The winds of the Meiji era blow strong, carrying with them the force of transformation. Traditions once held sacred now meet the demands of modernity. The weight of this moment is immense, and like a judoka caught in the grip of an opponent, we find ourselves thrown into the unknown.

But I ask you: Shall we resist, stiffen our bodies, and break upon the impact? Or shall we embrace the art of falling, ukemi, and rise again with grace and strength?

Read the rest of this entry »

Higher Self Café v7: Transcendent Self-Interest in an Age of Abundance

Continued from Higher Self Café v6: Wolfram, Langan, and Tolkien Discuss Reality


Have Mark Satin invite Maslow, Ayn Rand, and (later) Adam
Smith
to the Higher Self Cafe  to explore “transcendent self-interest” as a new organizing principle for society in an age of abundance

ChatGPT Prompt

The Higher Self Café hums with the quiet energy of intellectual discourse. Mark Satin, ever the idealistic host, sits with Abraham Maslow and Ayn Rand, trying to moderate what he hopes will be a groundbreaking discussion…


1. Act I: Cordial Beginnings, Building Tension

Satin:

Pouring tea, his tone warm and optimistic.
“Thank you both for coming. I’ve brought you here to explore an idea I believe could reshape society: transcendent self-interest. In an age of abundance, when survival is no longer our main concern, can self-interest evolve into something greater—a voluntary competition to leave a legacy that uplifts others?”

Maslow:

Leaning in, his voice steady, his words deliberate.
“It’s already happening, Mark. My studies of extraordinary individuals show that once basic needs are met, people crave meaning. Self-transcendence—going beyond oneself to serve a higher purpose—is the natural next step in human development.”

Rand:

Sitting upright, her voice sharp but calm, with a practiced precision.
“And yet, Abraham, you speak as if this so-called transcendence is somehow separate from the individual. You would have people sacrifice themselves for some nebulous ‘greater good.’ Let me remind you: rational self-interest is the only moral compass. Anything else leads to the destruction of freedom.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Weighing Ego Anchors: Breaking Free from Outdated Identities (ChatGPT as Freud)

Continued from Psychological Oobleck: A Fireside Chat on Assimilating Radical Change

As Freud, write about his personal journey to update the “ego anchors” of his signature theory in the light of homeostasis and canalization, leading to the idea of ego as the generative frontier between id and superego.

ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)

Theories, like the minds that conceive them, are not static. They are dynamic, shaped by conflict, refined by discovery, and occasionally, reanchored entirely. My own work on the psyche—rooted in the triumvirate of id, ego, and superego—has served as a sturdy framework for understanding the human mind. But as my ideas evolve alongside new insights into homeostasis and canalization, I must acknowledge that the ego itself—once considered the mediator of the psyche—is far more dynamic, creative, and generative than I initially believed.

This, I realize, mirrors my own journey. As I revisit the anchors of my theoretical framework, I see how some fixed points, once essential, now risk constraining new understanding. It is time to weigh anchor—to refine these ideas and embrace the ego’s role as a generative force, perpetually navigating the tensions between instinct, morality, and change.

Read the rest of this entry »
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started