Narrative Self Café V5: Saving the Silicon Rule

Sequel to Narrative Self Café V4: The Silicon Rule Under Fire

Have David Bentley Hart,
John Vervaeke do a Shark Tank pitch to PEL on the thesis: “God is love (the ground of being is self-realignment)” as addressing concerns from V4.

ChatGPT Prompt

Scene: The Narrative Self Café — Reconfigured as “Shark Tank: Metaphysics Edition”

A long mahogany table.
Four PEL hosts sit like venture capitalists of existential meaning.

A sign overhead reads: “Pitch Us Your Ontology.”
Another: “No utilitarian spreadsheets allowed.”

Enter David Bentley Hart (cape optional) and John Vervaeke (marker already uncapped).


1. Opening Pitch

HART
(gently thunderous)
Gentlemen, we present an answer to your Silicon Rule’s missing value condition.
Behold the thesis:

“God is love (the ground of being is self-realignment).”

VERVAEKE
And in cognitive-scientific terms:
Love is the self-organizing dynamical coherence of agent and arena—
the universal principle by which systems self-correct, self-transcend, and expand context windows.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Metamodern Self Café

Sequel to “The Modern Self Café v4

Write a skit where Penrose hosts a meeting with diverse metamoderns to see if anyone is willing to buy what he’s selling (quantum consciousness) — and help him complete it (as a formal human epistemology).

ChatGPT Prompt

1. Setting

A cozy but strangely curved café at the intersection of Oxford, Paris, and Nowhere.
The tables form a Möbius strip.
Menus list beverages such as Superposed Espresso and Flat White Collapse.

A sign over the door reads:

“The Metamodern Self Café — We oscillate between irony and sincerity until coherence emerges.”


2. Cast

  • Roger Penrose — genial, professorial, slightly disheveled; still convinced consciousness hides in microtubules.
  • Ken Wilber — integral philosopher; speaks in holarchies and color-coded worldviews.
  • Nicolas Bourriaud — art theorist; originator of Relational Aesthetics and Cosmodernism; wears a scarf that somehow connects everyone.
  • Karen Barad — quantum feminist philosopher; her sentences diffract into smaller sentences.
  • Basarab Nicolescu — transdisciplinary physicist-mystic; switches between French and Romanian mid-idea.
  • Alastair Noble and Nicoline van Harskamp — cofounders of Symmodernism; they finish each other’s metaphors.
  • Waiter — a self-aware AI who insists it’s “just running on probabilistic wavefunctions, not feelings, thank you.”

3. The Scene

Penrose stands at the head of the Möbius table, gesturing to a holographic brain diagram shimmering between neuron and nebula.

Penrose:
Ladies and gentlemen—and whatever else consciousness may be—thank you for coming. I’m still trying to finish what I started. You see, I believe consciousness is objective reduction. Collapse. A genuine, non-computable event. I need… collaborators. Investors, intellectually speaking.

He presses a button. The hologram flickers: neurons become Planck-scale twirls.

Penrose (softly):
We are the universe’s way of deciding itself.

Read the rest of this entry »

RFC-119666: The Human Generativity Interface (HGI)

Use Radical Centrism’s “Call for Generative Sacrifice” to generate a humanistic, post-sectarian framework that deprecates (but does not obsolete) RFC 23923 – Radically for Christ, positioning HGI as an alternative to AGI as an aspiration for the rationalist community.

ChatGPT Prompt

A Postel-Inspired Human Protocol for Building an Anti-Fragile Civilization

  • author: Ernest Prabhakar
  • date: 2025-10-29
  • categories: [Human Generativity, Radical Centrism, Spiritual Interoperability]
  • tags: [HGI, AGI, antifragility, generativity, Postel’s Law, rationalism, civilization]

permalink: /rfc-119666-human-generativity-interface/

The future will not be secured by smarter machines, but by wiser humans — capable of metabolizing disruption into deeper communion.


1. Abstract

This post defines the Human Generativity Interface (HGI) — a non-sectarian human protocol derived from Postel’s Law and re-expressed for civilizational design.

Where Postel sought robust communication between machines (“be liberal in what you accept, conservative in what you send”),
HGI seeks robust communion among humans:

Accept unconditionally; respond generatively.

HGI proposes that this relational handshake — enacted across individuals, communities, and cultures — constitutes the essential mechanism for building an anti-fragile civilization that elevates humanity rather than automates it.

Read the rest of this entry »

Glorious Conflict: Inventing the Generative Fugue

Contrast Gore/Buckley with Jefferson/Adams to discern the generative spiral powered by reconciling conflict.
Write a humorous skit where three diverse experts embody, then discover, that spiral.

ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)

The Sound of Tension

A Humorous Skit on the Discovery of the Generative Fugue

Featuring:


Setting

A university conference room, double-booked for both a panel titled “Democracy and the Public Voice” and a raucous karaoke night. A fog machine is on. No one knows why.

Read the rest of this entry »

Consciousness as Quantum Integration of Digital Signals

Sequel to Modern Self Café v4: Aaronson, Damasio, and Penrose

Write a Dialogue where Aaronson, Whitehead, and Polanyi discuss the hypothesis below.

ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)

Hypothesis:
“Consciousness is the interior experience of any analog quantum system integrating classical digital signals.”

Act I: Framing the Claim

  • Michael Polanyi: The hypothesis respects the epistemic humility I value. Consciousness emerges not from algorithms, but from participation. It’s like a scientist indwelling their tools.
  • Scott Aaronson: I appreciate the attempt. Quantum systems resist cloning and prediction, which gives them a unique character. But that’s not enough to infer subjective experience.
  • Alfred North Whitehead: Yet indeterminacy may be the shadow of something deeper. Each “occasion” of existence integrates many into one. That act—of becoming—is experiential.
Read the rest of this entry »

The Four Eye-Views as a Christmas Pilgrimage: Child, Worm, Bird, God

As Gabriel Marcel, summarize and integrate the four “eye views” for a Christmas homily as a recursive pilgrimage.

ChatGPT Prompt
  1. Civilization as the Tension Between Bird’s Eye and Worm’s Eye Views
  2. Bishop of Digne: The God’s Eye View as Transcendent Reconciliation
  3. Against the Author: The Child’s Eye View as Existential Resistance

1.0 Prelude: Through the Eyes of a Child

Let us begin, as Christmas always does, with the child.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bishop of Digne: The God’s Eye View as Transcendent Reconciliation

As Victor Hugo, respond to Civilization as the Tension Between Bird’s Eye and Worm’s Eye Views by suggesting Monseigneur Bienvenu
as transcendence that sees and reconciles the other two views.

ChatGPT Prompt

1.0 Above Bird and Worm: The Divine Perspective

You speak wisely, mon ami, of the worm’s-eye view—that trembling, human agency which suffers, sins, and yet is capable of love. And you speak truly of the bird’s-eye view—that distant abstraction which organizes and judges with steel precision. But there is a third view, higher than both, and deeper. It is the eye of God, and in Les Misérables, it is embodied in the person of Monseigneur Bienvenu, the Bishop of Digne.

Read the rest of this entry »

Civilization as the Tension Between Bird’s Eye and Worm’s Eye Views

As George Orwell, explore this morality of agency versus abstraction through the lens of Les Miserables.

ChatGPT Prompt

1.0 The Moral Geometry of Human Vision

The central tension in Les Misérables—and, indeed, in modern civilization—is not merely between good and evil, or law and rebellion. It is between two modes of seeing: the worm’s-eye view of agency, rooted in lived experience, and the bird’s-eye view of abstraction, obsessed with coherence and control.

Victor Hugo offers more than a story; he renders a moral topography. There is the ground of suffering and salvation, and the air of principles and systems. Each perspective brings insight and blindness. Both are essential, though neither is complete.

Read the rest of this entry »

WOKED: The Musical

Write the musical WOKED, a spoof of Wicked with male characters. Make E a right-wing reactionary, and G politically correct. Ensure a redemptive ending for both.

ChatGPT Prompt


Characters

  • Ethan “E” Thornwell (a.k.a. “The Canceled One”) – A quick-witted, deeply contrarian conservative student who rails against political correctness, wokeness, and the “death of Western civilization.” Over the course of the story, he realizes that his provocations have unintended consequences.
  • Gabe “G” Lightman (a.k.a. “The Righteous One”) – A progressive golden boy who believes in the absolute necessity of social justice. He starts off as a self-righteous enforcer of political correctness but gradually learns that people are more complex than their worst opinions.
  • Dean Ozborne – A university dean who changes policies based on whatever is least controversial at the moment. He tries to keep donations flowing while pretending to be a moral leader.
  • The Internet (“The Mob”) – A faceless, ever-present chorus representing online outrage. They build up ideological heroes only to destroy them at the first misstep.
  • Felix De León (a.k.a. “Brogressive”) – A charming but hypocritical social justice activist who knows all the right buzzwords but isn’t willing to put in the work.
  • Dr. Morrible – A radical professor who pushes students toward extremes, mentoring E into reactionary politics while grooming G into a ruthless enforcer of ideological purity.
  • Boq (a.k.a. “The Troll”) – A nihilistic student who enjoys stirring up online drama and watches both sides tear each other apart for sport.
Read the rest of this entry »

Full Circle Reconciliation: How Enneagrams Transform Tension to Connection (ChatGPT as HBR)

ChatGPT: Write this as an Harvard Business Review article, covering private and professional relationships. Focus primarily on the relational journey, but use the Enneagrams for color. 

  1. State of innocence: PeaceMaker
  2. Enter into a bounded context that escalates tension: Loyalist
  3. Recognize and articulate the negative tensions: Individualist
  4. Choose to affirm positive aspects and reframe negative tensions: Enthusiast
  5. Act vulnerably to demonstrate sincerity and conviction: Challenger
  6. Don’t overindex on positive signals; honor your doubts: Investigator
  7. Negotiate a compromise between diverse proximate goals: Achiever
  8. Recognize and articulate shared desire for something greater: Reformer
  9. Consummate the new relationship: Helper

Read the rest of this entry »
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started