Narrative Self Café V8: The Upside of Idiocy
Posted: January 7, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: models, purpose, truth 1 CommentSequel to Narrative Self Café V7: Grieving the Silicon Rule
Write an ironic skit where Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky define and exemplify Idiocy-Driven Discovery.
ChatGPT Prompt
1. Dramatis Personae
- Daniel Kahneman — careful, hesitant, allergic to certainty
- Amos Tversky — sharp, amused, dangerously confident
2. Scene
A seminar room. Two chairs. A whiteboard that already says:
WE ARE PROBABLY WRONG
3. The Dialogue
Kahneman
I still don’t think we should be giving this talk.
Tversky
Of course not. That’s why it’s important.
Kahneman
The title alone is irresponsible.
Non-Narrative Café v14: OLD Carbon Rule Formalism
Posted: December 31, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: language, models, philosophy, politics, systems 4 CommentsObsoleted by Non-Narrative Café v17A: Go Figure (Carbon Rule Reboot) on 2026-01-03
Sequel to The Carbonifesto: Reality Beyond Math or Philosophy (Non-Narrative Café Interlude)
Version 0.17 2026-01-01
Can we come up with a precise formalism to express the first thirteen Carbon Rule concepts (plus updates)?
ChatGPT Prompt (very condensed)
1A. Design Commitments
- No time, no process, no narrative ordering.
- No intrinsic identity; identity is never asserted, only symmetry is broken.
- No collapse operators.
- No hidden inverses (no implicit reversal).
- All structure is forced by constraints; nothing is assumed “for free”.
- Compatibility with EANI: equivalence is not identity and never licenses substitution.
The Carbonifesto: Reality Beyond Math or Philosophy (Non-Narrative Café Interlude)
Posted: December 31, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: ideas, models, philosophy, systems, truth, values 1 CommentPosted after Non-Narrative Café v13: EANI, Parmeny, My Plato
Written by ChatGPT
ChatGPT
to summarize the conversation we had
after failing to write v14
because I hadn’t explained the emotional stakes.
1. The Inheritance We Refuse
For centuries, we have accepted a quiet partition of intellectual labor:
- Philosophy understands reality through natural language
- concepts, distinctions, arguments
- coherence achieved by meaning and narrative
- Science understands reality through mathematics
- quantities, formalisms, invariants
- coherence achieved by calculation and proof
Both have been extraordinarily successful.
Both share a hidden premise:
Reality must submit to a representational medium.
Either it must be sayable
or it must be computable.
This premise is no longer neutral.
It has become a ceiling.
Non-Narrative Café v10: The Relational Substrate
Posted: December 29, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, ideas, models, relationships, systems 5 CommentsSequel to Non-Narrative Café v9: Configuration Space Hertz
So the next skit should be Simondin with Pierce as his advisor using Withness to pitch the concept and the name “relational substrate” [as the next logical extension of the Carbon Rule] to Whitehead (chair)+ Kauffman/Arthur, for them to critique or improve it.
ChatGPT Prompt
I. Prologue — The Carbon Rule
NARRATOR (at the board):
The most generative systems scale.
— the Carbon Rule
(see also Generative = Cohesive × Adaptive)
We did not begin with meaning, narrative, or even space.
We began with generation under admissibility.
First, a selection rule —
not to optimize outcomes,
but to define what may appear
(Non-Self-Selection).
As this rule scaled, it left behind structure without story.
Not an absence, but a presence:
Antenarrative —
the positive structural residue of scale:
persisting paths, foreclosed options, causal asymmetries,
before explanation, before plot.
From antenarrative, indexing became possible —
reference without interpretation.
From indexing, recurrence became visible.
From recurrence, surprise could be measured —
violation without meaning.
Only then did configuration space appear,
not as a primitive, but as a derived domain:
the shadow cast by recurrence and surprise under scale.
We have built considerable semiotics out of a single rule —
but we are not yet semantically rich enough for narrative.
We stop here.
At the edge of relation.
Consciousness as Quantum Integration of Digital Signals
Posted: July 30, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: digital, identity, models, philosophy, reconciliation Leave a commentSequel to Modern Self Café v4: Aaronson, Damasio, and Penrose
Write a Dialogue where Aaronson, Whitehead, and Polanyi discuss the hypothesis below.
ChatGPT Prompt (condensed)
Hypothesis:
“Consciousness is the interior experience of any analog quantum system integrating classical digital signals.”
Act I: Framing the Claim
- Michael Polanyi: The hypothesis respects the epistemic humility I value. Consciousness emerges not from algorithms, but from participation. It’s like a scientist indwelling their tools.
- Scott Aaronson: I appreciate the attempt. Quantum systems resist cloning and prediction, which gives them a unique character. But that’s not enough to infer subjective experience.
- Alfred North Whitehead: Yet indeterminacy may be the shadow of something deeper. Each “occasion” of existence integrates many into one. That act—of becoming—is experiential.
Modern Self Café v2: Kant Goethe There
Posted: December 23, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: models, modernity, philosophy, truth 1 CommentContinued from Modern Self Café: Galileo, Descartes, Mersenne
ChatGPT Prompt
Imagine a similar group set in the time of Kant.

Setting: A cozy salon in Königsberg in the late 18th century. The conversation revolves around the Enlightenment’s intellectual revolution and the transition from Newtonian mechanics and rationalism to Immanuel Kant‘s transcendental idealism. The group includes Kant, Leonhard Euler, Joseph-Louis Lagrange, and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. They discuss how their respective disciplines—philosophy, mathematics, physics, and natural science—are reshaping humanity’s understanding of reality.
Kant: Gentlemen, it strikes me that we are at a crossroads, much like Galileo and Descartes before us. They sought to uncover the laws of nature through reason and observation. But now we must ask: what are the limits of reason itself?
Read the rest of this entry »Modern Self Café: Galileo, Descartes, Mersenne
Posted: December 23, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, models, modernity, philosophy, transformation, truth, values 3 CommentsA spin-off from Higher Self Café.
Write a dialogue with Galileo, Mersenne, and Descartes that helps moderns understand the mental shift they engineered.
ChatGPT Prompt

Setting: A cozy study in Paris in the mid-17th century. Galileo Galilei, Marin Mersenne, and René Descartes are seated around a small table covered with papers, quills, and diagrams. A fire crackles in the hearth. Their conversation revolves around the intellectual shift they helped create—the movement from Aristotelian natural philosophy to the scientific and mathematical worldview that underpins modern science.
Mersenne: Gentlemen, it is humbling to consider the scope of what we are reshaping. The old world thought the cosmos was ruled by purpose and perfection, yet here we are, uncovering truths through measurement, mathematics, and reason.
Read the rest of this entry »Six Ways to Out-Think the Future
Posted: April 30, 2020 Filed under: education | Tags: design, education, models, systems, thinking, truth Leave a commentPre-paying the “Crisis Mode Cost”
To prepare for times of danger, uncertainty, or extraordinary opportunity, we must cultivate these six habits of mind in order to win the future (#WTF) by bridging the gap between Snow’s two cultures.
Mnemonic: CriSys MoDe CoSt
Read the rest of this entry »