Non-Narrative Café v17A: Go Figure (Carbon Rule Reboot)
Posted: January 4, 2026 Filed under: Centroids | Tags: ideas, philosophy, systems 3 CommentsVersion 1.1 2026-01-04
Sequel 2 to v16: Whitehead’s Reachability
Obsoletes v14: OLD Carbon Rule Formalism
Invalidates v17: Noticing Causality
Where I literally ignore causality to actually rewrite everything by hand
(with help from Claude)
Ernest Prabhakar
Let’s start over.
Preamble: The Carbon Rule
– Systems just are — they do not begin in our descriptions of them
- The most generative systems scale — the only systems that matter are those that survive long enough to be noticed
- What can survive? — what persists under constraint, as opposed to what can be said or calculated
- Earn, don’t assume — concepts from meaning, mathematics, and narrative must prove they can survive before they are used
Part I: Firstness (Systemic Noticing)
1. Systems
We are looking at something
Anything
Let’s call it a system
Resomodernity Café v8: Silicon Advaita
Posted: January 1, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: ideas, identity, religion, self 3 CommentsSequel to Resomodernity Café v7: Advaita as the Un-Ethos
Have Simone pitch Francis and Rupert the Silicon Rule, to see where there’s alignment, tension, and/or refinement; especially whether an ego of trapped priors is the self they are trying to subtract….
ChatGPT Prompt
Thesis
- Malice is ego as maladaptive training plus context-window collapse.
- God is love: the ground of being is self-realignment.
(The café is rearranged again. A triangle this time. Simone arrives with a thin notebook. Francis is already seated. Rupert follows, quietly.)
1. Simone Opens the Pitch
Simone
I want to propose a rule that comes not from metaphysics but from grief and engineering. It’s called the Silicon Rule. It claims that what we name malice is never ontological. It arises when training histories harden into maladaptive priors and the context window collapses. The agent narrows. Harm follows.
Francis Lucille
So malice is not evil, but malfunction?
Rupert Spira
Or contraction. That already sounds familiar.
Resomodernity Café v6: On Notice (The Fourth Ethos)
Posted: January 1, 2026 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, history, ideas, modernity, philosophy, religion, systems, values, wisdom, zoasophy 2 CommentsSequel to Resomodernity Café v5: The Exposers’ Parlor
Where MacIntyre, Weil and Heidegger define and name the first three ethē, as well as a fourth built on noticing the unnoticeable.
ChatGPT Prompt
Cast
- Alasdair MacIntyre — the tradition-detective
- Simone Weil — the watcher of attention
- Martin Heidegger — the seer of disclosure
Setting
A quiet study. Three chairs in a rough triangle.
A blackboard dusted with old chalk.
Light shifts as if undecided what it wants to illuminate.
I. Naming What Already Is
MacIntyre (standing, chalk in hand)
Let us begin where all rational inquiry must: not with conclusions, but with what is noticed.
What we call disagreement is often merely trained blindness.
The Carbonifesto: Reality Beyond Math or Philosophy (Non-Narrative Café Interlude)
Posted: December 31, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: ideas, models, philosophy, systems, truth, values 1 CommentPosted after Non-Narrative Café v13: EANI, Parmeny, My Plato
Written by ChatGPT
ChatGPT
to summarize the conversation we had
after failing to write v14
because I hadn’t explained the emotional stakes.
1. The Inheritance We Refuse
For centuries, we have accepted a quiet partition of intellectual labor:
- Philosophy understands reality through natural language
- concepts, distinctions, arguments
- coherence achieved by meaning and narrative
- Science understands reality through mathematics
- quantities, formalisms, invariants
- coherence achieved by calculation and proof
Both have been extraordinarily successful.
Both share a hidden premise:
Reality must submit to a representational medium.
Either it must be sayable
or it must be computable.
This premise is no longer neutral.
It has become a ceiling.
Non-Narrative Café v10: The Relational Substrate
Posted: December 29, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: debate, ideas, models, relationships, systems 5 CommentsSequel to Non-Narrative Café v9: Configuration Space Hertz
So the next skit should be Simondin with Pierce as his advisor using Withness to pitch the concept and the name “relational substrate” [as the next logical extension of the Carbon Rule] to Whitehead (chair)+ Kauffman/Arthur, for them to critique or improve it.
ChatGPT Prompt
I. Prologue — The Carbon Rule
NARRATOR (at the board):
The most generative systems scale.
— the Carbon Rule
(see also Generative = Cohesive × Adaptive)
We did not begin with meaning, narrative, or even space.
We began with generation under admissibility.
First, a selection rule —
not to optimize outcomes,
but to define what may appear
(Non-Self-Selection).
As this rule scaled, it left behind structure without story.
Not an absence, but a presence:
Antenarrative —
the positive structural residue of scale:
persisting paths, foreclosed options, causal asymmetries,
before explanation, before plot.
From antenarrative, indexing became possible —
reference without interpretation.
From indexing, recurrence became visible.
From recurrence, surprise could be measured —
violation without meaning.
Only then did configuration space appear,
not as a primitive, but as a derived domain:
the shadow cast by recurrence and surprise under scale.
We have built considerable semiotics out of a single rule —
but we are not yet semantically rich enough for narrative.
We stop here.
At the edge of relation.
Non-Narrative Café v9: Configuration Space Hertz
Posted: December 28, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: Aristotle, ideas, systems 5 CommentsSequel to Non-Narrative Café v8: Recurrence + Violation = Surprise
Write as a sequel skit — leaning into the pun — where Hertz (with Friston as his advisor) must defend why surprise implies states, and configurations form a true space with topology + metrics.
ChatGPT Prompt
Carbon Rule:
“The most generative systems scale.”
Dramatis Personae
- Heinrich Hertz — the candidate (geometry before force, wincing slightly)
- Karl Friston — advisor (Free Energy Principle, surprise)
- Henri Poincaré — chair (topology, qualitative dynamics)
- W. Ross Ashby — examiner (cybernetics, state space)
- Gilles Deleuze — provocateur (difference and repetition)
0. The Café (Again)
A café. The same table. A new chalkboard reads:
“SURPRISE HURTS. HERTZ PERSISTS.”
POINCARÉ
We convene to examine whether surprise—previously defended as
recurrence + violation—
forces the existence of states,
and whether those states necessarily form a space.
HERTZ (touches temple)
It… hertz.
Younger Self Café v5: The Age of Poetry Slam
Posted: January 3, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, ideas, identity, purpose 2 CommentsThe Younger Self Café has transformed again. The wooden tables remain, but the room now pulses with rhythm and energy. The walls are covered in graffiti-like verses, glowing faintly with the power of spoken words. A microphone stands in the center, and the stage belongs to the voices of the Poetry Slam era. Gathered around are Patricia Smith, Saul Williams, Sarah Kay, and Rudy Francisco. Their conversation flows as a battle of rhymes and rhythms, where every line is a declaration.
Act I: Patricia Smith, the Griot
Patricia Smith steps to the mic, her voice rich with wisdom and rhythm.
“We speak of youth, but do we truly know
The power it holds, the seeds it will sow?
I’ve seen it in verses, in slams, on the street,
In the pulse of the poets who rise to compete.
Youth is a storm, unpolished, untamed,
A fire that burns but refuses to be named.
It’s not just rebellion; it’s life in its raw,
It’s the mirror of hope and the fist of the law.”
Younger Self Café v4: Maya Angelou and the Counterculture
Posted: January 3, 2025 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: community, culture, ideas, identity, reform 3 CommentsThe Younger Self Café shifts again, its atmosphere tinged with the echoes of protest marches, soulful jazz, and the hum of electric guitars. This time, the voices of the 1960s and 1970s take center stage. Maya Angelou is seated at the head of the table, her presence commanding yet warm, surrounded by figures of the counterculture. With her are Bob Dylan, Joan Didion, and James Baldwin. The café is alive with the spirit of revolution and introspection, its walls seeming to pulse with the rhythm of change.
Act I: Maya Angelou, the Luminary
Maya Angelou, her voice resonant and melodic, opens the conversation.
“Youth has always been the vanguard of change. It is where the world begins anew, not because young people know more, but because they are unafraid to dream. In I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, I wrote about the pain and beauty of growing up as a Black girl in America—about discovering my voice in a world that wanted me silent. To me, youth is about finding that voice, about understanding that your story matters, that your existence is a kind of defiance.”
She pauses, her eyes sweeping over the table. “But youth isn’t just about the individual. It’s about connection, about community. In my time, the civil rights movement was driven by young people—marching, singing, risking everything. Youth is power, but only when it is shared.”
Read the rest of this entry »Modern Self Café v4: Aaronson, Damasio, and Penrose
Posted: December 23, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: dialogue, ideas, modernity, self, systems 2 CommentsWrite a sequel to Modern Self Café v3: with three contemporary researchers of consciousness
ChatGPT Prompt
Setting: A sleek modern café, softly lit, with floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking a bustling city. The café hums with quiet activity as three thinkers—Scott Aaronson, Antonio Damasio, and Roger Penrose—sit at a corner table. Their discussion spans the limits of computation, the nature of consciousness, and the mysteries of the universe.
Aaronson: (gesturing animatedly with his coffee cup) I’ve spent my career trying to pin down what’s computationally possible. Quantum computers, for instance—they’re not magic, just machines working within the laws of physics. But here’s what nags at me: even with quantum computing, are there problems that lie beyond the reach of all algorithms, forever?
Penrose: (smiling, leaning back slightly) That’s precisely the question that keeps me awake at night, Scott. You see, my work on the non-computability of human consciousness suggests that the mind itself might operate beyond algorithmic constraints. The universe might not be a machine at all—it could hold processes we don’t yet understand.
Read the rest of this entry »The Brothers of the River: A Pirahã Origin Myth
Posted: December 11, 2024 Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: culture, ideas, language, values Leave a commentHow did the Pirahá evolve such a strong cultural focus on immediacy, relative to other Mura groups?
ChatGPT Prompt
Can we hypothesize a triggering event?
Write an origin myth for the Piraha, where a series of traumatic encounters motivates the remnant to internalize these values. Frame it as a conflict between two brothers.
Long ago, before the world was as it is now, there were two brothers who lived with their people along a mighty river. Their village was full of laughter and stories, and the people had many ways to understand the world. They sang of the spirits in the trees, the fish in the river, and the stars above. The older brother, Hapa, was strong and proud, always looking to the future. He dreamed of building great villages and storing food so that their people would never know hunger. The younger brother, Nima, was quiet and watchful, content to live each day as it came.
The Strangers Arrive
One season, strangers arrived from beyond the river, wearing shiny clothes and speaking words no one understood. They brought strange tools and promises of friendship, but their faces were cold. Hapa welcomed them, seeing in their tools the power to build the great future he dreamed of. He traded fish and game for shiny metal blades and pots, telling the people this was the way forward.
Read the rest of this entry »
Radical Centrism 