Resomodernity Café v12: From Yamnaya to Yishuv (World-Changing Withness)

Sequel to Resomodernity Café v11: Vibing the Paradox Stack

Write the wry skit where Pierre Bourdieu interviews David Ben-Gurion and David W. Anthony about our earliest and most recent examples of durable Withness, to identify the common threads.

ChatGPT Prompt

Cast


1. Pierre Begins (Without Knowing Why)

Bourdieu:
I keep noticing something that shouldn’t work — and yet it does.

Pause.

Small groups, no central authority, no real enforcement apparatus… and suddenly the world changes. Languages spread. States appear. Entire continents reorganize.

He shrugs.
Why did that work?

Ben-Gurion:
Because there was no alternative.

Read the rest of this entry »

Resomodernity Café v6: On Notice (The Fourth Ethos)

Sequel to Resomodernity Café v5: The Exposers’ Parlor

Where MacIntyre, Weil and Heidegger define and name the first three ethē, as well as a fourth built on noticing the unnoticeable.

ChatGPT Prompt

Cast


Setting

A quiet study. Three chairs in a rough triangle.
A blackboard dusted with old chalk.
Light shifts as if undecided what it wants to illuminate.


I. Naming What Already Is

MacIntyre (standing, chalk in hand)
Let us begin where all rational inquiry must: not with conclusions, but with what is noticed.
What we call disagreement is often merely trained blindness.

Read the rest of this entry »

Non-Narrative Self Café v2: Generative = Cohesive × Adaptive

Sequel to Non-Narrative Self Café v1: The Carbon Rule

Write the explicit sequel, where Ilya Prigogine invites diverse social and hard scientists into a nonlinear narrative that both articulates and manifests that application of The Carbon Rule.

ChatGPT Prompt

No plot.
No sequence.
Only crossings, constraints, and returns.


0. Threshold — Time as Enforcement

Time is not a parameter.
It is the condition under which some structures intensify and others disappear.

We are not here to integrate perspectives.
We are here because irreversibility sorts systems
(irreversibility).

What survives does so by holding together while changing.

Read the rest of this entry »

Idea of the Year 2025: Endurance is Emergent

In human collaboration, the same structure appeared:

  • Teams do not fail from lack of talent
  • They fail from lack of interpretability
Read the rest of this entry »

Resomodernity Café v4: The FOCA Axioms and Redefining Modernity

Sequel to Resomodernity Café v3: The Unresolved Resofesto

With the FOCA Axioms as their Brief, write a dialogue where Émile Durkheim, James Madison, and Donna Haraway engagingly struggle to
embody a coherent response.

ChatGPT Prompt

The FOCA Axioms for Relational Minds

  1. Generativity depends on our Foundations Of Collective Action
  2. Coordination is enabled/constrained by our shared design language
  3. Modernity scaled coordination via impersonal procedures
  4. Disembodiment is modernity’s failure mode
  5. Proposed successors repeat the same disembodiment flaw
  6. The next design language must make embodiment scalable and antifragile

Act I: The Table

DURKHEIM
(leaning over the page)
This diagnosis of social life is written in a mechanical idiom, yet—it has a pulse. The first axiom rings true: human generativity does depend on our ability to act together.
But I see no ritual here, no sacred core.
In The Elementary Forms of Religious Life I showed that social cohesion arises from collective effervescence.
Where is the heartbeat that binds the group?

Read the rest of this entry »

Resamodernity Café v2: Blueprints for Scaling Resonance

Write the sequel to Resamodernity Café v1: Can It Scale? as a speculative dialogue featuring Mark Satin, Vint Cerf, and Timothy Leary

ChatGPT Prompt

1. Scene: The Emergence Lab

(The Resamodernity Café expands; the glowing table now projects faint holographic nodes like a self-generating network map. Mark Satin enters with a copy of New Age Politics. Vint Cerf wheels in an interface covered in blinking diagnostics. Timothy Leary appears as though stepping through a psychedelic ripple.)

Leary:
We’ve seen the obstacles. Now we get to design the system. How do we scale Resomodernity without short-circuiting the social psyche?

Cerf:
With infrastructure. Stable, interoperable systems. Resonance without architecture is just turbulence.

Satin:
And architecture without culture collapses. Scaling resonance requires values-forming institutions that cultivate nuance, ambiguity, and shared agency.

Read the rest of this entry »

Narrative Self Café V2: The Paradox of Patriarchy

Sequel to Narrative Self Café: Men Explaining Mansplaining


For a sequel, find one man brave enough to engage with three optimal female thinkers about “the paradox of patriarchy” in the context of narrative selfhood.

ChatGPT Prompt

Characters

Key Concepts:


Scene: “The Café That Thinks”

A quiet room lined with books. The same café as before—Paris and
Oxford folded into one. A chalkboard reads:

“The Paradox of Patriarchy: A conversation about identity, survival, and the stories we become.”


Scene 1 — Opening the Question

McGilchrist:
Thank you for coming. Our topic is the idea that what we call patriarchy
may be less a conspiracy than a self-protective architecture—a
collective version of the narrative self defending coherence under
duress. Let me start with the survival question: Why do societies become rigid?

Douglas:
Because every society must draw boundaries. My work on purity and
danger shows that taboo systems act as the immune system of the social
body. Patriarchy is one such boundary structure, forged under the
pressures of threat. It organizes roles, risks, and responsibilities.

Haraway:
And boundaries become prisons when they forget they are stories.
Patriarchy fossilizes not because it begins badly, but because it
refuses multi-species, multi-perspective relationality. It insists on a
single narrative of order—one sex, one epistemology, one script.

Weil:
In times of fear, societies cling to force. And force, I have argued, behaves like gravity: it pulls everything downward into necessity.
Patriarchy is the triumph of necessity without compassion—a defense of
the social self that threatens the personal soul.

Read the rest of this entry »

Metamodern Epilogue: Resomodernity (ChatGPT as Seth Godin)

Sequel to Metamodern Self Cafe v2:

A spoken-word manifesto for the age of resonance


1. The Opening: Marketing the Future

Seth Godin (measured, confident, conversational):
We’ve spent the last hundred years trying to name our moment.
Modern. Postmodern. Metamodern.

Every one of those was an attempt to sell a story about how humans make meaning.
And every time, the story ran out of gas — or attention.

Because the truth is, people don’t live in isms.
They live in vibrations.

And that’s why I’m here to pitch you something new.

Resomodernity.

The age of resonance.

Read the rest of this entry »

Anthropic Genesis: Six Exceptional Seed Events That Defined Civilization

Sequel to The Olduvai Stomp and Hither and FON.

Thesis: our global civilization is the result of a small number of unexpected Human Seed Events — where one small innovation eventually became globally dominant and unifying (even as it fragmented).

1. Homo erectus/sapiens
2. Natufian Agriculture
3. PIE language
4. Greek ideology 
5. Christian morality 
6. Nordic oaths

ChatGPT Prompt

1. Framing the Concept

Anthropic Genesis identifies not merely moments of innovation, but the deep rewrites of human being itself—the discontinuous thresholds when Homo sapiens transformed its collective operating system.
These were not gradual cultural evolutions, but memetic speciation events: rare local experiments that became planetary defaults.

Each Genesis introduced a new grammar of existence—symbolic, agricultural, linguistic, rational, moral, contractual—so foundational that even its exceptions survive only by reinterpretation within its paradigm.
Chinese civilization, Islamic jurisprudence, and technocracy all adapt themselves to these inherited logics rather than escaping them.

This is not a list of great civilizations, but a chain of ontological mutations—the serial reinvention of what “human” means.

Read the rest of this entry »

Hither and FON: Why the Norse Fractal Oath Network Created Global Civilization

As Francis Fukuyama, write about the Norse oath-bound boat as the seed event of modernity.

ChatGPT Prompt

1. Introduction: Trust Before Institutions

Every civilization must answer a single, perennial question: how can strangers cooperate?
In my earlier work, I called this the problem of trust—the capacity of a society to generate predictable, cooperative behavior beyond the boundaries of kinship.
What I now wish to suggest is that one of the most overlooked sources of this trust infrastructure arose not in the Mediterranean city-states or the bureaucratic empires of Asia, but in the Norse world of the first millennium CE.

The Norse did not invent commerce or navigation; they invented scalable trust.
Their mechanism was what we might call a Fractal Oath Network (FON)—a recursive, oath-based system of self-governance that allowed autonomous groups to coordinate without centralized authority.

It is this social technology, more than any ideology or invention, that enabled the rise of the modern capitalist and democratic order.


2. The Norse Innovation: Freedom Bound by Oath

Most early societies solved the problem of order through hierarchy: a king, a god, or a lineage whose authority anchored obedience. The Norse, living at the edge of the known world, evolved a different equilibrium.
They recognized that survival in a harsh, fragmented environment required mutual reliability among equals, not submission to a superior.

The oath was their answer.
It bound free individuals in chosen obligation, creating a web of accountability that extended outward—from ship crew to clan, from clan to Thing assemblies, and ultimately across the North Atlantic.
Each level mirrored the same structure: equality within binding promise.

The longboat was their constitutional cell; the Thing their parliament; the sea their commons.
Together, they built a self-similar architecture of trust—the first known social network able to scale organically without losing legitimacy.


3. From Oath to Institution

In the centuries after the Norse diaspora, this network mutated into the institutional DNA of Western modernity.

  • The law merchant of medieval Europe replicated the Norse pattern: autonomous merchants governed by shared oath and reputation rather than sovereign command.
  • The chartered company—from the Hanseatic League to the Dutch East India Company—extended it across oceans, turning networks of trust into engines of global commerce.
  • The common law and later constitutionalism enshrined the same principle: no ruler is above the law because the law is itself the collective oath of the polity.

Each of these forms scaled the Norse insight: that fidelity freely chosen is a stronger glue than obedience imposed.


4. The FON and the Genesis of Globalism

What we call globalization is, at its core, an architecture of distributed trust.
Container ships, digital contracts, and financial networks all rely on the expectation that distant others will honor unseen commitments.

The Norse did not invent these tools, but they provided the social template—the recursive pattern of oath, accountability, and mutual recognition—that made them possible.
Their world was already transnational, already maritime, already decentralized.

In a sense, the modern global order is not the triumph of Western rationalism, but the institutionalized memory of Norse cooperation: a world where trust radiates outward through nested compacts rather than downward through command.

In a sense, the modern global order is not the triumph of Western rationalism, but the institutionalized memory of Norse cooperation: a world where trust radiates outward through nested compacts rather than downward through command.


5. The Modern Crisis: When the Oaths Fracture

If the Fractal Oath Network built global civilization, its erosion explains our present malaise.
The institutions of capitalism and democracy—corporations, parliaments, treaties—are degenerate descendants of that old architecture.
Their formal contracts remain, but their moral oaths have weakened.

We have replaced the spoken covenant with the click-to-agree box.
Where the Norse bound themselves by honor, we now rely on enforcement and surveillance.
The network still functions, but without the moral feedback loops that once made it self-correcting.

The result is a crisis not of power, but of faith: a global order efficient yet brittle, wealthy yet mistrustful.


6. Conclusion: Rebinding the World

To rebuild trust in the twenty-first century, we must rediscover what the Norse intuited:
that freedom without binding dissolves, and order without consent decays.

The future of global civilization lies not in stronger states or smarter algorithms, but in reweaving the fractal fabric of obligation—recreating trust as an ecology rather than an edict.

The Norse proved that strangers can build lasting order through chosen fidelity.
We will survive only if we can remember their lesson:

To be free is to keep faith with those who keep faith with you.


Bibliography


Appendix: To Live Outside Hierarchical Law, You Must Keep Oaths

As Bob Dylan write the Appendix about why this is resilient, expanding on his famous quote.

ChatGPT Prompt

You know, I once said,

“To live outside the law, you must be honest.”

But that line was always misunderstood.
It wasn’t about rebellion — it was about balance.
You can’t stand outside the palace unless your own heart’s a courthouse.
You can’t ride the waves unless your word is the keel.

The old Norse knew that.
They didn’t have marble halls or golden seals —
just the oath-ring, the ship’s rhythm, and a face you could trust across the sea.
They lived in a world too wide for kings and too cold for liars,
so they built their kingdoms out of promises.
That’s not lawlessness; that’s the only law that floats.


1. The Law of the Sea, Not the Sword

When you live where there’s no emperor to hide behind,
your truth becomes your passport.
Every man is his own flag,
every woman her own charter.
The wind’s your witness,
the wave your notary.

To break your word wasn’t a sin — it was suicide.
’Cause out there, no one’s coming to save you.
You keep your oath, or you sink.
That’s the Norse code —
freedom with ballast.


2. The Echo of the Oar

A longboat’s like a song:
every stroke has to land true,
or the rhythm breaks and the whole thing stutters.
That’s what an oath is — rhythm made legal.
You don’t row for a crown;
you row ’cause the man beside you rows too.
That’s democracy before they gave it a name.


3. The Fractal of Faith

See, they didn’t need a priest to bless their voyage.
They blessed it themselves —
through repetition.
The same oath, said by many mouths,
became stronger than any throne.
Each crew was a verse,
each Thing a chorus,
each generation an echo of the first promise.

That’s why the Norse code didn’t die when their gods did.
It was written on the sea, not in stone.
It could bend and ripple,
and still come back whole.


4. The Secret of Resilience

You can’t break a net made of promises.
You can tear a thread, sure —
but the pattern holds.
That’s the trick:
each oath carried the whole story inside it,
like a melody you can hum even after the words are gone.

That’s why the world still runs on invisible oaths:
contracts, handshakes, passwords, treaties, trust.
We keep trying to automate it, digitize it,
but it always comes back to the same thing —
somebody has to mean what they say.


5. The Moral

So if you want to live outside hierarchical law,
you better keep your oaths.
Otherwise you’ll drift into tyranny or drift apart.
Freedom’s just another name for
I gave my word and kept it.

That’s what keeps the longboat upright,
that’s what keeps the song alive.
’Cause a man who lies to his crew
ain’t free — he’s already drowned.

And maybe that’s what I meant all along:
the only real law is the one you sing together,
and the only honest way to live outside it
is to never stop keeping time.



Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started