Mark Satin pursues “America’s Purpose” at NAF Terrorism Conference
Posted: September 16, 2005 Filed under: News Comments Off on Mark Satin pursues “America’s Purpose” at NAF Terrorism ConferenceRadical Middle writer Mark Satin outlines “a
12-Point Plan for Combatting Terrorism and Becoming More
Understanding, More Humane, AND MORE EFFECTIVE in the Process”, based on his
observations of the New America Foundation’s conference on “Terrorism,
Security, and America’s Purpose.” Read the rest of this entry »
Pundita on the Kargil Morality Tale, told in soup
Posted: August 26, 2005 Filed under: Governance Reform Comments Off on Pundita on the Kargil Morality Tale, told in soupshout-out in her poignant, first-person parable about shepherding Americans in
Kargil — as a metaphor for the central truth that foreign policy systematically
overlooks:
Dr.
Ernie, I hope you see this essay. The ultimate point I make is that
it’s just a bunch of
people, whether they reside on
the other side of the globe or right here in the USA. To never lose sight of
that fact is to always have a bridge that is much stronger than academic
analysis and policy and development language.
We might not always be
‘right’ in how we try to deal with the problems of the developing world, but the
bridge allows us to keep refining communications.
So it is for dealing
with misunderstandings that arise between neighbors, co-workers and family
members, and so it is for “foreign” relations and development strategies.
…
I’m
not saying a couple master chefs can’t do wonders with a few kerosene stoves and
cooking pots, but the other Westerners at the table were lulled by their
expectations into assuming that the kitchen staff and accouterments matched the
menu offerings.That,
in one sentence, is the type of mistake behind much that goes wrong with US
policy toward governments in less-developed countries. Such governments have
learned to project the trappings of modernized administration but are in truth a
long way from modern and informed.
Pundita’s response to Sach’s “Global War on Poverty”
Posted: August 24, 2005 Filed under: Governance Reform Comments Off on Pundita’s response to Sach’s “Global War on Poverty”Foreign-policy blogger Pundita graciously took
the time to summarize her perspective on Jeffrey Sach’s proposed solution to global poverty. Read the rest of this entry »
How to help the Working Poor
Posted: August 23, 2005 Filed under: News Comments Off on How to help the Working PoorInstitution has a fascinating presentation that appears to argue that the best
way to help the working poor — beyond creating
accessible, high-value jobs — is to lower their artificially high cost of
living (due to perceived risk, market abuses, and poor
information).
Shortening the “Long Tail” of politics
Posted: August 23, 2005 Filed under: News Comments Off on Shortening the “Long Tail” of politicsmarketing and technology circles; one example is how Amazon makes more money on the million non-best-sellers
its able to carry than it does on the top 100,000 you’d find at a corner
bookstore. To put it actionably, rather than merely trying to monetize the most
popular items, create an infrastructure that allows you to cost-effectively
monetize the entire “tail” of the
distribution.
Read the rest of this entry »
Billy Rojas’ Radical Centrist Manifesto, Part I
Posted: August 22, 2005 Filed under: Centroids Comments Off on Billy Rojas’ Radical Centrist Manifesto, Part Iimpressive article, on the detailed philosophical and historical basis of
Radical Centrism:
Radical Middle Psychology
Posted: August 21, 2005 Filed under: News Comments Off on Radical Middle PsychologyLike radical middle politics, radical middle psychology is pragmatic and ethical and conducive to personal growth. It is tailor-made for those of us who are committed to being fully present for each other while doing great things in this world.
Radical Centrist Philosophy ? In Quotes!
Posted: August 16, 2005 Filed under: Centroids Comments Off on Radical Centrist Philosophy ? In Quotes!impressive two-part series outlining the basis of a Radical Centrist philosophy.
The first part is primarily a collection of fascinating quotes from
classical, modern, and current thinkers (including yours truly :-). The second
is what I might call an early historical analysis of the emergence of radical
centrism.
Read the rest of this entry »
Pundita on post-modern paternalism
Posted: July 28, 2005 Filed under: Governance Reform Comments Off on Pundita on post-modern paternalismwould’ve liked — I came across as way more ‘soft’ than I’d intended — but it
was still gratifying to see Pundita’s lengthy response to post-modern paternalism:
But Pundita gets your
drift and appreciates it: as private citizens we should strive to create
relationships that are based on our personal value system. Yet if 9/11 has
taught us anything, we should also pay more attention to our civic duties.
don’t know how to term
this matrix, except maybe to call it, “What Americans and especially Americans
in big business, the news media, State Department, Pentagon, Congress and the
White House need to know about peoples in really old cultures who are stuck in
their ways and very proud, and who know they have to change their ways but who
don’t appreciate peoples from very young cultures who act like know-it-alls just
because they’re
rich.”
I sense from the
wording of your proposal that this matrix is also of interest to you. If so, let
it be known that we here in Pundita-land — this would include even the squirrel
member of Pundita’s foreign policy team — applaud all intelligent efforts to
bridge the old-young gap in US foreign policy relations. It is this gap, rather
than the communism/ capitalism, democracy/ despotism, WTO membership/
nonmembership gaps that is the most important one for American foreign relations
to bridge.
When is Balance One-Sided?
Posted: July 26, 2005 Filed under: Governance Reform Comments Off on When is Balance One-Sided?On my way out, a legislative aide who was attending stopped me to chat and asked, “Isn’t this a one-sided panel? Two moderate legislators and an administration official.”
I guess he meant that there were not enough partisans on the panel.
But only in Sacramento could a Republican, a Democrat and a Democrat working for a Republican be considered one-sided.