→

Modern Self Café v5: Sexmantics (The Meaning of Sex)

Posted: February 10, 2026 | Author: | Filed under: AI-Powered Essays | Tags: , , , , , , |Leave a comment

Write as Saturday Night Live–style skit where Byung-Chul Han “comes out” to his 1950’s sex-squeamish dad Viktor Frankl and meaning-squeamish mom Aella.

ChatGPT Prompt

INT. TOO-NEAT LIVING ROOM – NIGHT

Plastic on the couch. A doily. One psychology book face-down like it’s ashamed.

ON SCREEN: “The Han Family Living Room”

HAN sits rigidly.
FRANKL clutches a mug with both hands like it’s protection.
AELLA scrolls her phone, visibly allergic to abstraction.

1. THE SETUP

FRANKL
So! We’re all here.
Which is… fine.
No one is sick. No one is… experimenting.

HAN
I need to tell you something important.

FRANKL
(too fast)
Is it medical?

HAN
No.

FRANKL
Good. Because bodies are… temporary vessels.

AELLA
Can we hurry? I have a spreadsheet open.

2. THE FIRST HINT

HAN
I’ve been… practicing something.

FRANKL
(concerned)
Practicing what?

HAN
Sex.

FRANKL
(chokes on air)
I’M SORRY—
I thought you said “sex.”

HAN
Yes.

FRANKL
Well that can’t be right because no one practices that.
That just… happens… quietly… in the dark…
…to married people… eventually.

AELLA
Okay but statistically, most sex is practice.
Like, very bad practice.

3. THE REAL CONFESSION

HAN
It’s not the sex.
It’s the meaning.

AELLA
(physically recoils)
Oh no.
No no no no no.

FRANKL
Meaning is respectable.

AELLA
Meaning is a slippery slope.
First it’s “meaning,” then suddenly everyone’s crying during foreplay.

HAN
Sex says something.
It forms the self.

FRANKL
(covers ears)
I do not want to hear what it says.

4. NAMING IT (DISASTER)

HAN
I call it… Sexmantics.

FRANKL
That sounds…
clinical.

AELLA
That sounds like you’re about to tell me my kink has a thesis statement.

HAN
Every repetition trains identity.

AELLA
Nope!
I collect data. I don’t become it.

5. THE PARENTS PUSH BACK

FRANKL
Young man, sex is not about meaning.
It’s about love.
And procreation.
And never discussing it again.

AELLA
And meaning is not about sex.
Meaning is for books, wars, and podcasts that are three hours too long.

HAN
But you can’t separate them!

FRANKL
We separated everything just fine in the 1950s.

6. THE AWKWARD JABS

HAN
With respect—
your marriage was extremely… quiet.

FRANKL
We had values.

AELLA
And zero data points.

HAN
And you—
you explore everything but refuse to ask what it’s doing to you.

AELLA
Because that’s how you ruin a perfectly good experiment.

7. THE SNL ESCALATION

HAN
Sex without meaning becomes empty!

AELLA
Meaning without sex becomes a TED Talk!

FRANKL
PLEASE STOP SAYING THE WORD “SEX” SO CONFIDENTLY.

(Beat.)

HAN
I am…
(a deep breath)
a sexmanticist.

8. SILENCE

A beat. Then—

FRANKL
I don’t understand it.
I don’t like it.
But…
(sighs)
at least you’re taking responsibility.

AELLA
I still hate the word “meaning.”
But…
if this helps people stop lying to themselves…
fine.

9. BUTTON

FRANKL
Just promise me one thing.

HAN
Yes?

FRANKL
Never explain this to your grandparents.

AELLA
Or put it in a PowerPoint.

HAN
No promises.

FRANKL & AELLA
HAN!

CUT TO BLACK.

TITLE CARD

Sexmantics:
It’s not what you’re doing. It’s what it’s doing to you.

APPLAUSE.

Appendix I: Sexmantics and Erotilogotherapy

1. Definitions (Clean, Non-Negotiable)

Erotilogotherapy

The theoretical claim that the primary sex drive is meaning, by direct extension of Viktor Frankl’s axiom that the primary human drive is meaning, as articulated in Logotherapy.

Sexmantics

The practice of erotilogotherapy:
the disciplined attention to what sex means, trains, and forms through repetition.

This is not a metaphorical distinction.
It is structural.

2. Etymological Derivation (Explicit and Intentional)

Erotilogotherapy

Derived from three Greek roots:

  • Eros (ἔρως) — desire, longing, attraction; the force that moves the self toward union and becoming
  • Logos (λόγος) — meaning, word, reason, intelligible order
  • Therapeia (θεραπεία) — care, cultivation, disciplined practice

Erotilogotherapy therefore names:

the disciplined care of eros as a meaning-seeking force.

It explicitly rejects reducing sex to:

  • pleasure mechanics
  • behavioral regulation
  • relational hygiene

and instead situates sex within teleology and formation.

Sexmantics

A deliberate compression of:

  • Sex — embodied eros, enacted desire, repetition with consequence
  • Semantics (σημαντικός / sēmantikós) — meaning, significance; what a sign says and does

Sexmantics therefore means:

the meanings sex carries, produces, and trains through enactment.

The term is intentionally:

  • blunt rather than euphemistic
  • Anglo-Saxon in impact, analytic in implication
  • resistant to therapeutic dilution

3. Why This Is Not Sex Therapy

Sex therapy asks:

  • Is this consensual?
  • Does this reduce distress?
  • Can this be integrated relationally?

Sexmantics asks:

  • What is this act saying?
  • Who is being formed by repeating it?
  • What future self is being trained?
  • What cost is being incurred — now and later?

Sex therapy optimizes function.
Sexmantics interrogates formation.

These are different domains.

4. The Core Claim

Sex is never neutral.
Sex is always semantic.
Every sexual act participates in meaning-making, whether acknowledged or not.

This is why:

  • pleasure alone cannot explain obsession
  • novelty escalates when meaning collapses
  • “harmless” repetition still trains identity
  • shame half-works and permission half-fails

Meaning is already operating.
Sexmantics simply makes it legible.

5. The Error of Modernity

Modernity committed a category error by treating sex as:

  • biological function
  • psychological expression
  • private preference
  • risk-managed behavior

In doing so, it divorced sex from narrative.

The result:

  • intensity without direction
  • freedom without authorship
  • exploration without integration
  • emptiness mislabeled as liberation fatigue

Sexmantics restores the missing layer: story.

6. Meaning Is Not Morality

Sexmantics does not assert:

  • universal norms
  • inherited taboos
  • behavioral rules
  • tribal authority

It asserts something stricter and harder:

You are responsible for what sex makes of you.

No shame required.
No permission sufficient.

7. Why Practice Matters

Meaning is not discovered once.
It is trained.

Sexmantics treats sexual life as:

  • a formative practice
  • an apprenticeship in becoming
  • a site of authorship, not impulse discharge

This is why practice is the right word.

Insight without repetition changes nothing.
Repetition without meaning changes everything — usually sideways.

8. The Asymmetry That Explains Everything

  • Pleasure attenuates with repetition.
  • Meaning accumulates with repetition.

When sex feels hollow, compulsive, or escalating, the problem is rarely desire.

It is semantic drift.

9. The Non-Optional Question

Sexmantics does not ask:

  • “Is this allowed?”
  • “Is this normal?”
  • “Is this healthy?”

It asks:

What story does this act tell about who I am becoming?

That question cannot be outsourced.
It cannot be neutralized.
And it does not go away if ignored.

10. In One Sentence

Erotilogotherapy names the truth:

The primary sex drive is meaning.

Sexmantics is the discipline that follows:

learning to hear what sex is already saying — and taking responsibility for what it makes of you.

Everything else in this work is downstream of that distinction.

Appendix II: Sex Therapy as Modernity’s Canary

1. Why Sex Therapy, of All Things

Sex therapy is not uniquely flawed.
It is uniquely revealing.

Sex is the domain where:

  • desire is strongest,
  • self-deception is hardest,
  • norms are load-bearing,
  • consequences accumulate slowly but inexorably.

When a society’s philosophy of meaning breaks, sex is where the fracture shows first.

Sex therapy is therefore not the problem.
It is the canary (see Canary in a coal mine).

2. The Structural Contradiction

Modern sex therapy attempts an impossible balance:

It works only while the moral substrate it disavows remains intact.

This is not hypocrisy.
It is structural dependency.

3. The Domain Shift That Makes Survival Possible

To remain viable, sex therapy performs a subtle unconscious domain shift:

From:

  • Who am I becoming?

To:

  • How do I feel right now?

From:

  • What does this mean?

To:

From:

  • What does this cost over time?

To:

This shift is clinically effective —
and existentially evasive.

4. The Asymmetrical Use of Shame

Sex therapy publicly declares:

  • “shame is counterproductive.”

Quietly, it:

  • shames inherited restraint,
  • pathologizes moral hesitation,
  • delegitimizes concern for cost,
  • reframes ambivalence as pathology.

At the same time, it relies on:

The field survives by shaming the experience of the very norms it consumes.

5. Why This Shows Up in Sex First

Other therapeutic domains can lean on external goods:

  • productivity,
  • survival,
  • sobriety,
  • relational stability.

Sex cannot.

Sex is upstream of:

When meaning collapses, sex becomes:

  • compulsive,
  • escalatory,
  • hollow,
  • confusing.

Sex therapy sees this first —
and lacks the language to name it.

6. Late-Stage Symptoms

As the background consensus erodes, sex therapy increasingly turns to:

  • trauma language,
  • dysregulation frameworks,
  • attachment theory as catch-all,
  • ever-finer consent distinctions.

These are not wrong.
They are insufficient.

They manage breakdown without addressing the missing variable: meaning.

7. Why the Field Cannot Fix This

To address the problem fully, sex therapy would have to say:

  • sex forms the self,
  • repetition trains identity,
  • some costs are irreversible,
  • authorship cannot be outsourced,
  • meaning cannot be neutral.

Saying this would:

  • reintroduce authority,
  • collapse therapeutic neutrality,
  • fracture institutional consensus.

So the field hedges.
It must.

8. The Canary’s Song

The failure mode is not that sex therapy harms everyone.

It is that it only works for those whose moral formation is already complete.

As that population shrinks, the cracks widen.

Sex therapy does not predict modernity’s crisis.
It registers it.

9. What the Canary Is Pointing Toward

The canary is not asking for:

  • more technique,
  • better normalization,
  • finer-grained permission.

It is signaling the need for a missing layer:

  • sex as meaning,
  • desire as formative,
  • freedom as responsibility,
  • practice as authorship.

This is the space Sexmantics and Erotilogotherapy occupy.

Not as replacements for therapy —
but as the upstream framework therapy cannot supply.

10. In One Sentence

Sex therapy is modernity’s canary because it is the first field to fail when:

  • meaning is removed,
  • authority is denied,
  • shame is pathologized,
  • and yet formation must somehow continue.

The canary is not dying to be dramatic.

It is dying because the air has changed.

Appendix III: Sexmantic versus Tantric

1. Why This Comparison Is Necessary

Sexmantics will inevitably be mistaken for Tantra.

Both:

But they part ways at the most important point:
where meaning comes from and how it binds.

2. Tantra: Meaning as Energetic Continuity

Tantric frameworks—especially in their modern, Westernized forms—tend to treat sex as:

The underlying assumption is:

Meaning is already there — sex helps you tap into it.

Sex becomes a technology of access:

  • do the practice correctly,
  • align energy,
  • dissolve ego (ego death),
  • experience unity (nondualism).

Formation is real, but it is largely impersonal.

3. Sexmantics: Meaning as Authored Consequence

Sexmantics makes a harder claim:

Meaning is not guaranteed.
It is produced—or distorted—by what you repeatedly do.

Sex is not a channel to pre-existing meaning.
It is a meaning-making act that trains the self over time.

Where Tantra asks:

  • How do I access deeper states?

Sexmantics asks:

  • Who am I becoming through this repetition?

4. Technique versus Interpretation

Tantra emphasizes:

  • posture,
  • breath (breathwork),
  • ritual (ritual),
  • timing,
  • intentional energy flow.

Sexmantics emphasizes:

Tantra refines experience.
Sexmantics interrogates formation.

5. Transcendence versus Continuity

Tantric sex often aims at:

  • peak states (peak experience),
  • ego dissolution,
  • boundary loss,
  • timelessness.

Sexmantics is suspicious of peaks.

It is oriented toward:

A transcendent moment that fragments the narrative still counts as a failure.

6. The Role of Authority

Tantra typically relies on:

Even modernized Tantra borrows from inherited sacred frames.

Sexmantics explicitly rejects inherited authority.

It says:

  • no guru decides meaning,
  • no ritual guarantees depth,
  • no tradition absolves cost.

Meaning must be owned, not received.

7. Why Tantra Can Drift into Bypass

Because meaning is presumed to be intrinsic, Tantra can:

  • aestheticize intensity,
  • spiritualize escalation,
  • bypass ethical accounting (ethics),
  • treat experience as self-justifying.

Sexmantics blocks this move.

Intensity does not equal meaning.
Sacred language does not cancel consequence.

8. Where Tantra Gets Something Right

Sexmantics does not dismiss Tantra outright.

Tantra correctly intuits that:

Sexmantics simply insists that experience is not the final arbiter.

9. The Decisive Difference (One Line)

  • Tantra: sex reveals meaning that already exists.
  • Sexmantics: sex creates meaning that must be lived with.

That difference changes everything.

10. Why Sexmantics Is Not a Spiritual Practice

Sexmantics does not promise:

It promises something more severe and more durable:

You will become what you practice.

No ritual can save you from that.
No transcendence exempts you from authorship.

11. In One Sentence

Tantra asks how sex can lift you beyond yourself.

Sexmantics asks whether sex is making you someone you can continue to be.

Only one of those questions survives time.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

→
Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started