[RC] comments on Washinton 'Post article

[Avesland at aol.com]

To All:
The phrase "Radical Center" has somehow made it to the corner offices
at the Post. This is good news. However, Dione uses the phrase in a  non-RC
way, or pretty much in a non-RC way. This means that an opening exists  to
reach him with the Gospel of Pure Truth,  viz, our very own version of  RC.
 
For literalists out there, this is said tongue in cheek. Ours is not the  
only 
conceivable version of RC, obviously, and  we have not (as far as I  know)
received a Divine Revelation on the subject. Yet, we have important things 
to say and to contribute to the political discussion. But how do we get  our
voices heard ?
 
Any suggestions ? What if a letter to Dione would actually stand a chance  of
being looked at by him ? What a difference that might make. 
 
One good way to reach gros legumes (that's French for "big shots")  is via
the assistants to such people. OK, but how do we do that ? This  problem
is just about as difficult as direct contact. 
 
This is open for anyone's comments. Any ideas at all ? 
 
That is, I work on the assumption that folks like Dione receive 1000  e-mails
per day on slow days. How do you break through the clutter to get noticed  ?
No matter how sincere or heartfelt your e-mail is, if it doesn't get read,  
it cannot
got anyplace. This is the fundamental problem.
 
Hence this call for smart suggestions.
 
Regards
Billy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/centroids_radicalcentrism.com/attachments/20061024/268effc5/attachment.html